David Johnston_POL300-017016_Article Review

David Johnston_POL300-017016_Article Review - Article...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Article Review of “Clash of Civilizations” David CE Johnston Contemporary International Problems POL 300 017016 Summer 2009 August 23, 2009
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Huntington’s assessment of the future in world politics raises some very interesting points. I do agree with him that civilizations will play a more important role in the future and that the “West vs. the Rest” mentality will become prevalent, if it is not already. However, I also disagree with him on many of his main points. I believe that his idea of civilizations is too broad and that religion, not civilization, will be the main point of conflict in the near future. In fact, his writings actually demonstrate my point for me, which I will explain later. I also believe that while religion will be the main source of conflict, it will not end up ruling the world like he suggests civilizations will. I completely agree with Huntington that civilizations will be one of the main factors in terms of conflict in the future. His first reason for making this assumption is that the distinctions between different civilizations are basic. (Huntington, 1993) In other words, civilizations are separated by some of the most essential human characteristics; i.e. history, language, and religion. It makes sense that this will exist in the future because it already does, just on a smaller scale; cultural conflict. The only reason why civilization conflict will overtake cultural conflict is because the world is shrinking due to advances in technology and increased communications, especially through the media. In fact, that is Huntington’s second reason to support his argument, claiming that more interactions between civilizations results in a magnification of the “differences between civilizations and commonalities within civilizations.” (Huntington, 1993) Huntington’s next argument to support his theory is that the dissimilarities of human characteristics between different civilizations are harder to change compared with political or
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/11/2009 for the course POL 300 taught by Professor Hafezi during the Summer '09 term at Strayer.

Page1 / 6

David Johnston_POL300-017016_Article Review - Article...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online