This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Suggested Answers for Math of Finance, Test # 2; March 10, 2009 1. a. (3) State the Efficient Market Hypothesis. b. (2) Give an example where the EMH holds, and where it does not. Answer: This answer can be found in the notes. 2. (10) Find a change of variables to convert V t + S 2 2 V S 2 + S V S V = 0 into an equation with constant coefficients. Answer: By use of the chain rule, we have that V S = V x dx dS To eliminate the bad portions of the problem, let dx dS = 1 S . To compute the second derivative, 2 V S 2 = S ( V S ) = S [ 1 S V x ] = 1 S 2 V x + 1 S S [ V x ] . But by using the chain rule one more time, S [ V x ] = x [ V x ] dx dS = 1 S 2 V x 2 . Substituting this term into the above, and then all of these terms into the original equation, we have the much simpler expression V t + 2 V x 2 V = 0 . 3. (10) a. Prove (i.e., give the details) that if t < T , then a European Put P ( S,t ) must go below the curve max ( E S, 0) . State the conditions when this happens. Answer: Using the PutCall Parity, solving for P , and then adding and subtracting E yields P ( S,t ) = C ( S,t ) + Ee r ( T t ) S = E S + [ E ( e r ( T t ) 1) + C ( S,t )] ....
View Full
Document
 Spring '09
 Saari
 Math

Click to edit the document details