IDquotes - that it is not science.” Judge John E Jones in...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
"There are natural systems that cannot be adequately explained in terms of undirected natural forces and that exhibit features which in any other circumstance we would attribute to intelligence.” William A. Dembski. "The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design." Downers Grove, Ill.: Intervarsity Press, 2004, p. 27." “It is our view that a reasonable, objective observer would, after reviewing both the voluminous record in this case, and our narrative, reach the inescapable conclusion that ID is an interesting theological argument, but
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: that it is not science.” Judge John E. Jones in Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District, December 20, 2005 Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science. Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences, Second Edition ( 1999 ) National Academy of Sciences (NAS)...
View Full Document

  • Spring '08
  • National Academy of Sciences, Intelligent design, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, William A. Dembski, undirected natural forces, interesting theological argument

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online