1) crimpro_weisselberg_2003spr

1) crimpro_weisselberg_2003spr - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
C RIMINAL P ROCEDURE I. Prosecutorial Discretion A. What are the factors considered in prosecuting a crime? 1. Severity of the crime 2. Probability of conviction/ sufficiency of evidence 3. Factors re the Offender: a. recidivism b. motivation of the offender c. past record – dangerous to society 4. Resource allocation of prosecutors – there are more severe crimes that should be prosecuted 5. Public Eye - Reflects poorly on office/police to prosecute bogus crimes 6. Alternative Sanctions/ diversion program B. Lafave: 3 reasons we need prosec discretion 1. overcriminalization 2. enforcement resources are limited 3. need to individualize justice C. Prosecutorial Discretion and Legislative Intent : 1. Separation of Powers – if the legislature did make it a criminal act to commit this offense (ex. Smokey the Bear Hype) – is it the role of the prosecutor’s office to determine which laws should be enforced and which should not? Isn’t this sort of an example of the executive interpreting the intentions of the legislature? 2. Cf. Legislatures are not very good about going through the books and cleaning up these laws which are out of date or ridiculous. 3. Considerations when P charges maximum penalty for minor offense b/c she “knows” that D is guilty of more serious unprovable crimes (when a defendant’s possible involvement in other crime for which there is insufficient evidence – may persuade a prosecutor to charge the highest sentence allowable): a. Within Leg. Provisions: Still operating within the terms of legislation provided (max. penalty) – therefore you cannot go to an unreasonable extreme. On the other hand, this may be an offense which is never prosecuted to its fullest extent, never to the limits allowed be legislation. b. Judge Ultimate Sentencer: The prosecution can only push for a particular sentence – there is still the backstop of the judge who can conform to norms and only to the routine sanction. The judge may not consider the D’s possible criminal involvement in the sentencing determination. 4. ABA Standards for Prosecution : p. 854: 3-2.5(a) - each office should have a handbook of policies which guide them in their discretion. 3-25(b) – the handbook should be open to the public, except for subject matters which are deemed “confidential.” D. Challenging the Prosecutor’s Discretion - Judicial Deference to Prosecutorial Discretion: 1. Inmates of Attica p. 862 – the inmates sought a writ of mandamus to require federal official to investigate and prosecute guards who had violated federal statutes in treatment p. 46 page 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
of inmates in the prison. Mandamus can only compel someone to do a mandatory (not discretionary) act. Plaintiff relies on a statute which “authorizes and requires” the U.S.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/21/2009 for the course LAW All taught by Professor All during the Fall '09 term at University of the West.

Page1 / 61

1) crimpro_weisselberg_2003spr - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online