Conlaw.Richards.fall.05

Conlaw.Richards.fall.05 - Constitutional Law Outline...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Constitutional Law Outline Richards, Fall 2005 Origins of Constitutional Law [class notes 1-4] Britain was based on a parliamentary supremacy system, but Americans viewed British as untrue to their constitutional guarantees. This feeling informed the revolution, which must be understood as a constitutional revolution . Once drafted, Madison was profoundly disappointed with the Constitution, for failure to protect human rights, specifically with regards to religion and slavery. He viewed the document as morally bankrupt and felt that it would ultimately destroy America. Additionally was concerned about protecting people against liberty violations from states, which he viewed as a threat. o Post Madison, Americans, especially in the south, begin to accept constitutionalism with slavery. Madison’s pleas are overlooked and forgotten. o Reconstruction Amendments finally allow national power to be used against the states (specifically the 14 th Amendment), in an effort to protect individual liberties. This broad view of the amendments did not catch on initially, and was not fully realized until post- WWII, but it was used from the start as a tool to protect irrational racism. o King and the civil rights movement help to fully realize the 14 th Amendment as a guarantee of human rights. Constitutional Interpretation [class notes, reading notes] Constitutional Interpretation by the Judiciary, and Judicial Review o Marbury v. Madison (US 1803) [Gunther p.3, reading notes 1, class notes 4-7] Considers the entitlement of Marbury to an appointment, that was not realized with a commission by the subsequent Jefferson administration. The court finds that Marbury has a right to the commission as a matter of law, there is a remedy at law, but fails to grant mandamus after finding that the dispute was improperly before the Supreme Court on original jurisdiction – denies relief. Case is important for it creates the concept of judicial review . Marshall denies relief because he thinks that the Judiciary Act of 1789’s grant of original jurisdiction for mandamus is not consistent with Article III of the Constitution, which outlines instances where the Supreme Court is to have original jurisdiction. Thus there is also a strong argument for constitutional supremacy . o McCulloch v. Maryland (US 1819) [book 90, reading 7-8, class 5] Congress chartered a national bank, with branches in various states. Maryland enacted a tax to be levied against the national bank branch in the state. Marshall, for the court, finds that the state taxing of the federal bank is unconstitutional, for it hinders the exercise of national power. While states have the power to tax, they cannot exercise it in a way that is in opposition to the federal powers. Here the federal powers are constitutional, not expressly, but on an implied basis, and thus as the means are narrowly tailored to a legitimate goal, judicial deference is in order. Richards notes that this case stands for the idea that there are some matters which
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 09/21/2009 for the course LAW All taught by Professor All during the Fall '09 term at University of the West.

Page1 / 61

Conlaw.Richards.fall.05 - Constitutional Law Outline...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online