This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1 Announcements & Such Pink Floyd : Shine on You Crazy Diamond Administrative Stuff Ive added a link to L A T E X for Logicians to our website. HW #1 resub is due today @ 4pm @ the 12A Drop Box (301 Moses). Homework formatting. From now on, please put the following: Name, GSI, section time, and date. on all assignments and exams (upperright corner of first page). HW #2 has been posted. Its due (first submission) next Friday. See, also, the HW Tips & Guidelines Handout, pertaining to HW #2. Chapter 2 (LSL), Continued More Symbolization from English to LSL Symbolizing English sentences into LSL. Symbolizing entire English arguments into LSL. UCB Philosophy Chapter 2 09/12/08 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 2 English LSL VIII: Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction The tilde operates only on the unit that immediately follows it. In K M , affects only K ; in (K M ) , affects the entire K M . It is not the case that K or M is ambiguous between K M , and (K M ) . Convention : It is not the case that K or M K M . Not both S and T (S & T ) . [Chapter 3: (S & T ) means the same as S T . But, (S & T ) does not mean the same as S & T .] Not either S or T (S T ) . [Chapter 3: (S T ) means the same as S & T , but (S T ) does not mean the same as S T .] Here are some examples involving , &, and (not, and, or): 1. Shell is not a polluter, but Exxon is. ?? 2. Not both Shell and Exxon are polluters. ?? 3. Both Shell and Exxon are not polluters. ?? UCB Philosophy Chapter 2 09/12/08 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 3 4. Not either Shell or Exxon is a polluter. ?? 5. Neither Shell nor Exxon is a polluter. ?? 6. Either Shell or Exxon is not a polluter. ?? Summary of translations involving , &, and (not, and, or): Logish LSL Not either A or B . (A B) Either not A or not B A B Not both A and B . (A & B) Both not A and not B . ( Neither A nor B.) A & B DeMorgan Laws (we will prove these laws is Chapter 3): [ (p q) is equivalent to (means the same as) [ p & q [ (p & q) is equivalent to (means the same as) [ p q But, [ (p q) is not equivalent to [ p q . And, [ (p & q) is not equivalent to [ p & q ....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 09/23/2009 for the course PHIL 12A taught by Professor Fitelson during the Spring '08 term at University of California, Berkeley.
 Spring '08
 FITELSON
 Philosophy

Click to edit the document details