notes_8_2x2

# notes_8_2x2 - Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1& \$...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1 ' & \$ % Announcements & Such • John Coltrane : Summertime • Administrative Stuff – HW #2 has been posted. It’s due (first submission) Friday. – See my “HW Tips & Guidelines” Handout, pertaining to HW #2. – I’ve posted the solutions for HW #1. – I recommend Schaum’s Outline of Logic (or any other introductory symbolic logic textbook) for additional solved problems. • Chapter 2 (LSL), Continued — More Symbolization from English to LSL – Symbolizing English sentences into LSL. * Rules for (verbatim) symbolization of sentences “in a vacuum”. * Deciding on atomic sentence lexicon is often the hard part. – Symbolizing entire English arguments into LSL. * Symbolizing sentences in the context of an argument . * Here, we have a principle of charity for argument symbolization. UCB Philosophy Chapter 2 09/15/08 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 2 ' & English ֏ LSL II ( ∼ , & , ↔ ): Example #2 • ‘If, but only if, they have made no commitment to the contrary, may reporters reveal their sources, but they always make such a commitment and they ought to respect it.’ – Step 0: Decide on atomic sentences and letters. S : Reporters may reveal their sources. C : Reporters have made a commitment to protect their sources. R : Reporters ought to respect their commitment to protect sources. – Step 1: Substitute into English, yielding “Logish”: If, but only if, it is not the case that C , then S , but C and R . – Step 2: make the transition into LSL (in stages as well, perhaps): S iff not C , but C and R . Final Product: (S ↔ ∼ C) & (C & R) UCB Philosophy Chapter 2 09/15/08 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 3 ' & \$ % English ֏ LSL II ( ∼ , & , ∨ , → , ↔ ): Example #3 • ‘Sara is going unless either Richard or Pam is going, and Sara is not going if, and only if, neither Pam nor Quincy are going.’ – Step 0: Decide on atomic sentences and letters. P : Pam is going. Q : Quincy is going. R : Richard is going. S : Sam is going. – Step 1: Substitute into English, yielding “Logish”: S unless either R or P , and not S iff neither P nor Q . – Step 2: Make the transition into LSL (in stages again): S unless ( R ∨ P ), and ∼ S iff ( ∼ P & ∼ Q ) ( ∼ (R ∨ P ) → S) & ( ∼ S ↔ ( ∼ P & ∼ Q)) • It is also acceptable to replace the ‘unless’ with ’ ∨ ’, yielding: (S ∨ (R ∨ P )) & ( ∼ S ↔ ( ∼ P & ∼ Q)) UCB Philosophy Chapter 2 09/15/08 Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 4 ' & English ֏ LSL VIII: Some More Problems to Try • A Bunch of LSL Symbolization Problems: 1. California does not allow smoking in restaurants. 2. Jennifer Lopez becomes a superstar given that I’m Real goes platinum....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 4

notes_8_2x2 - Branden Fitelson Philosophy 12A Notes 1& \$...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online