PHL301_10-26_ANSELM - BTWNGCBT. 5. Therefore, God does not...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
ANSELM’S ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1. God is BTWNGCBT (BEING THAN WHICH NONE GREATER THAN BE THOUGHT) 2. God exists at least in the understanding, if not in reality (We have an idea of God in our minds.) 3. To exist in reality is greater than to exist only in the understanding (only as an idea in someone’s mind) 4. If god existed only in the understanding and not in reality, God would not be a
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: BTWNGCBT. 5. Therefore, God does not exist only in the understanding, God exists in reality. (Circular? A circular argument presupposes that the conclusion is already stated in the premises. In the argument the three premises 1,2,3 and 4,5 are the logical argument that follows the premises. Put all the arguments together, and itll be a good argument that God exists.) 1...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/27/2009 for the course PHL 301 taught by Professor Bonevac during the Fall '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online