This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: approximation of the power-rate function, i.e. f ( r ) = 0.6r 3 . In our simulation, I compared BABS+ACG with BABS+RCG. Although stage 1 was the same for both algorithms, stage 2 differed and gave us interesting results. As can be seen in Figure 17 and Figure 18, our results were inline with the results in . In Figure 17, BABS+RCG uses slightly less transmission power on average as compared to BABS+ACG. This is because some of the constraints (explained in the previous section) were more relaxed in case of BABS+ACG and hence it suffers a slight performance hit. However, relaxed constraints allow BABS+ACG to run much faster than BABS+RCG (shown in Figure 18). The difference in execution times becomes large as the number of users K increases. This is a good example of the performance vs. simplicity tradeoff. ACG trades some performance to achieve considerably lower complexity....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 09/27/2009 for the course ECE 399 taught by Professor Prof during the Spring '09 term at University of Texas at Austin.
- Spring '09