Candidate must fill this section:Candidate Name:FERNANDA DE OLIVEIRA PRADOCandidate ID:CTI2017485Privacy Release Clause:“I give my permission for my assessment material to be used in the auditing, assessment validation & moderation Process”Candidate Signature:Date:Assessment Completion Status: (Trainer Use Only)AttemptSatisfactoryNon-SatisfactoryDateAssessor’s SignatureInitial attempt2ndattempt/Re-assessmentCANTERBURYTECHNICAL INSTITUTEASSESSMENTBSB50215Diploma of BusinessAdministrationAssessment Code: (Steve supply bar code)ASSESSOR GUIDE:BSBADM506 Manage business document design and development Version 1.0 - 2015CRICOS Code – 02938M RTO No: 31645
Canterbury Technical InstituteCRICOS Code – 02938M RTO No: 31645Information for Candidate:All work is to be entirely of the candidate.General Information for this assessment:Read the instructions for each question very carefully.Be sure to PRINT your FULL name & LAST name in every place that is provided.Short questions must be answered in the spaces provided.For those activities requesting extra evidence such as: research reports, ESSAY reports, etc. The student must attach its own work formattedin double space, Arial 12 pts. All activities must be addressed correctly in order to obtain a competence for the unit of competency.If the candidate doesn’t understand the assessment, they can request help from the assessor to interpret the assessment. Re-assessment of Result & Academic Appeal procedures:If a student at CTI is not happy with his/ her results, that student may appeal against their grade via a written letter, clearly stating the grounds ofappeal to the Deputy Principal. This should be submitted after completion of the subject and within fourteen days of commencement of the new term.Re-assessment Process: An appeal in writing is made to the Deputy Principal providing reasons for re-assessment /appeal. Deputy Principal will delegate another faculty member of CTI to review the assessment.The student will be advised of the review result done by another assessor.If the student is still not satisfied and further challenges the decision, then a review panel is formed comprising the lecturer/trainer in charge, the Deputy Principal and the Director of Student Services OR if need be an external assessor.
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read all 5 pages?
Qualitative Research, CANTERBURYTECHNICAL INSTITUTE