Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism

Extreme and - Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism J J C Smart In Smarts article he addresses the differences between extreme and restricted

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism – J. J. C. Smart In Smart’s article he addresses the differences between extreme and restricted utilitarianism, specifically arguing for the side of extreme utilitarianism. According to extreme utilitarianism, the “rightness or wrongness” of an individual action depends on how good or bad the consequences are. If the good outweighs the bad (increases utility) the action is moral, and if the bad out weights the good (decreases utility) the action is immoral. Restricted utilitarianism tells us that moral rules must be followed at all times. Unlike extreme utilitarianism, “moral rules are more than rules of thumb.” An action is right or wrong not according to its consequences, but according to the rule the action follows. If a rule generally increases utility, any action to follow said rule is considered moral. If a rule generally decreases utility, any action to follow said rule is considered immoral. Actions may be tested by their consequences only in the case where the action
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/01/2009 for the course PHIL 262g at USC.

Page1 / 3

Extreme and - Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism J J C Smart In Smarts article he addresses the differences between extreme and restricted

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online