Matriarch to Patriarchy[1]

Matriarch to Patriarchy[1] - Colleen M. Jackson From...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Colleen M. Jackson From Matriarchy to Patriarchy The question over whether or not an actual matriarchy has ever existed has been going on for decades. In 1972, feminist Gloria Steinem wrote: Once upon a time, the many cultures of this world were all part of the gynocratic age. Paternity had not yet been discovered, and it was thought…that women bore fruit like trees—when they were ripe. Childbirth was mysterious. It was vital. And it was envied. Women were worshipped because of it, were considered superior because of it[1] Since then, scholars, researchers and feminists have been looking for supporting evidence of this women-ruled society or on the flip side, setting about trying to disprove this theory. Though some accept the idea that some form of human society was matriarchal, women- centered or goddess-worshipping, there are an equal number who pass it off as myth. The basic outline of the matriarchal society has three main ideas. The first is the idea that, in a time before written records, society revolved around women. They were honored for their life-giving powers and revered as incarnations and priestesses. Raising their children to continue their way of life, women made all the important community decisions. Secondly, through some cataclysmic event, society was drastically altered and thereafter dominated by men. This culture set the ideology that exists today, the patriarchy. And finally, now that society is aware of the true history, men and women can work together to restore a balance between the sexes. [2] (Though some critics have disregarded the existence of a true matriarchy, perhaps it is because of the wide array of terms that are associated with it. As Mary Daly stated, matriarchy is “not patriarchy spelled with an ‘m’ [3]. Instead, most supporters of the idea would define it as “the ascendancy of the Mother’s ways,” or as “a realm where female things are valued and where power is exerted in non-possessive, noncontrolling, and organic ways that are harmonious with nature.”[4] Confusion arises when other terms are used interchangeably, such as “gylany,” “gynocracy,”
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
“matricentric,” “matristic,” “gynolatric,” “partnership,” “gynosociety,” and “matrifocal” [5] All of these terms refer to a time when mothers and women were the centers of societies. In support of the matriarchy, some sociologists and anthropologists have discovered cultures that fit the idea of a female-based society, both in the past and more recent. Simply because a women-ruled society is not identical to a male-based society, this is not reason to discredit the matriarchy or declare its nonexistence. In other words, some have disregarded these simpler tribal communities because they are not run as a patriarchy. The whole idea of the matriarchy, as Daly pointed out, is not “patriarchy with an ‘m,’” nor is it a mirror image of a patriarchy. Instead, it contains its own unique ideologies, values, priorities and structures. The first of such a society is the Minangkabau culture in West Sumatra, Indonesia. For more than
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/01/2009 for the course HIST hist101 taught by Professor Grube during the Fall '09 term at École Normale Supérieure.

Page1 / 13

Matriarch to Patriarchy[1] - Colleen M. Jackson From...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online