This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: UGBA 103 Midterm 2 Solutions 20081029 1. Without the value from growth opportunities, the price would be negative. So we can say that PVGO &gt; 8. 2. (a) Note that we could do this on a pershare basis or in terms of the total value of the firm. Ill do the former: PEG MSFT = P MSFT /EPS MSFT g MSFT = $21 . 96 / ($20 / 8 . 89557) . 12 = 81 . 3944655 Now we want to use MSFT as a comparable for AAPL to find P AAPL , so we set PEG MSFT = PEG AAPL and solve for the price: PEG MSFT = PEG AAPL PEG MSFT = P AAPL /EPS AAPL g AAPL P AAPL = PEG MSFT EPS AAPL g AAPL = 81 . 3944655 $5 . 08 . 8883 . 22 = $102 . 41 where weve rounded the share price to the nearest 0 . 01. 3. We know that ROE &gt; r , where r is the market capitalization rate. If the firm permanently increases the payout ratio, it decreases the earnings retained for new investment each year. Since ROE &gt; r , these foregone investments have positive NPV, so this decision decreases firm value, and hence decreases the stock price. 4. (a) Since ROE = r , any earnings retained (regardless of the payout ratio) are invested in projects with NPV = 0 these neither hurt or help the firms value. Hence the stock value doesnt depend on the payout ratio. (b) PV GO = 0 because ROE = r . (c) PV GO = 0, so we can value the stock based on its current earnings level: P = EPS r + PV GO = $14 . 12 + 0 = $116 . 67 5. We are being asked to explain why high P/E ratios dont necessarily mean a stock is overvalued. So what are some reasons a stock can rationally have a high P/E , i.e. that some stocks have higher P/E s than others?s than others?...
View
Full
Document
 Spring '09
 ODEAN

Click to edit the document details