ProblemSet2Ans - ECON 3200 Introduction to Econometrics...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ECON 3200 Introduction to Econometrics Answers for Problem Set 2 Problem 1 (Wooldridge C3.8) We can use Table 3.2. By definition, 2 > 0, and by assumption, Corr( x 1 , x 2 ) < 0. Therefore, there is a negative bias in 1 % : E( 1 % ) < 1 . This means that, on average across different random samples, the simple regression estimator underestimates the effect of the training program. It is even possible that E( 1 % ) is negative even though 1 > 0. Problem 2 (Wooldridge 3.10) (i) Because 1 x is highly correlated with 2 x and 3 x , and these latter variables have large partial effects on y , the simple and multiple regression coefficients on 1 x can differ by large amounts. We have not done this case explicitly, but given equation (3.46) and the discussion with a single omitted variable, the intuition is pretty straightforward. (ii) Here we would expect 1 % and 1 to be similar (subject, of course, to what we mean by almost uncorrelated). The amount of correlation between 2 x and 3 x does not directly effect the multiple regression estimate on 1 x if 1 x is essentially uncorrelated with 2 x and 3 x ....
View Full Document

Page1 / 3

ProblemSet2Ans - ECON 3200 Introduction to Econometrics...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online