This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: MATH 135: COMPLEX NUMBERS (WINTER, 2008) The introduction of complex numbers in the 16th century made it possible to solve the equation x 2 + 1 = 0. These notes 1 present one way of defining complex numbers. 1. The Complex Plane A complex number z is given by a pair of real numbers x and y and is written in the form z = x + iy , where i satisfies i 2 = 1. The complex numbers may be represented as points in the plane (sometimes called the Argand diagram). The real number 1 is represented by the point (1 , 0), and the complex number i is represented by the point (0 , 1). The xaxis is called the real axis, and the yaxis is called the imaginary axis. For example, the complex numbers 3 + 4 i and 3 4 i are illustrated in Fig 1a . Fig 1a r 3 + 4 i 7 r 3 4 i S S S S Sw Fig 1b : 3 r r r 4 + i 2 + 3 i 6 + 4 i Complex numbers are added in a natural way: If z 1 = x 1 + iy 1 and z 2 = x 2 + iy 2 , then z 1 + z 2 = ( x 1 + x 2 ) + i ( y 1 + y 2 ) (1) Fig 1b illustrates the addition (4 + i ) + (2 + 3 i ) = (6 + 4 i ). Multiplication is given by z 1 z 2 = ( x 1 x 2 y 1 y 2 ) + i ( x 1 y 2 + x 2 y 1 ) Note that the product behaves exactly like the product of any two algebraic expressions, keeping in mind that i 2 = 1. Thus, (2 + i )( 2 + 4 i ) = 2( 2) + 8 i 2 i + 4 i 2 = 8 + 6 i We call x the real part of z and y the imaginary part , and we write x = Re z , y = Im z . ( Remem ber : Im z is a real number.) The term imaginary is an historical holdover; it took mathematicians Date : November 26, 2007. 1 These notes are based on notes written by Bob Phelps, with modifications by Tom Duchamp. 1 2 (WINTER, 2008) some time to accept the fact that i (for imaginary, naturally) was a perfectly good mathematical object. Electrical engineers (who make heavy use of complex numbers) reserve the letter i to denote electric current and they use j for  1. There is only one way we can have z 1 = z 2 , namely, if x 1 = x 2 and y 1 = y 2 . An equivalent statement (one that is important to keep in mind) is that z = 0 if and only if Re z = 0 and Im z = 0. If a is a real number and z = x + iy is complex, then az = ax + iay (which is exactly what we would get from the multiplication rule above if z 2 were of the form z 2 = a + i 0). Division is more complicated (although we will show later that the polar representation of complex numbers makes it easy). To find z 1 /z 2 it suffices to find 1 /z 2 and then multiply by z 1 . The rule for finding the reciprocal of z = x + iy is given by: 1 x + iy = 1 x + iy x iy x iy = x iy ( x + iy )( x iy ) = x iy x 2 + y 2 (2) The expression x iy appears so often and is so useful that it is given a name. It is called the complex conjugate of z = x + iy and a shorthand notation for it is z ; that is, if z = x + iy , then z = x iy . For example, 3 + 4 i = 3 4 i , as illustrated in the Fig 1a . Note that z = z and z 1 + z 2 = z 1 + z 2 . Exercise (3b) is to show that z 1 z 2 =...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 10/12/2009 for the course MATH 134 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at University of Washington.
 Fall '08
 Staff
 Complex Numbers

Click to edit the document details