{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Western Civilization - project notes

Western Civilization - project notes - Project Notes 1 2 3...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Project Notes: 1. Introduction—show both sides, symbolism 2. Critics, conditions of working 3. Reforms 4. Contemporary child labor in developing countries, organizations Slide 1: Child labor has long been a symbol of the exploitation of workers and the immorality brought about by the Industrial Revolution. John Redman, who had experience working in the textile trade at the age of eight, asserts that child abuse is not an inherent component of the factory system. In his testimony, Redman says, “There may be instances, but generally they are as well treated in mills as any where else. Those parents who look after their children now, and place them now with masters who treat them well, will manage them well… those parents who now place their children, for the sake of higher wages, with spinners who ill-treat them, rather than with neighbors or friends, will, I suppose, treat them in the same way as they do now, that is, neglect them.” This testimony demonstrates how the treatment of children within the factories was not necessarily worse than the treatment they received within the home. Furthermore, the parents, by deciding which factory owner their child would work for, were the main determinants of how the children were treated. Societal expectations also contributed to the use of child labor. According to societal standards, a “busy” child could be equated to a good child. People believed that children would grow up to become self-sufficient and independent individuals if they adopted a strong work ethic. From a more pragmatic approach, historians have also looked at child labor in the Industrial Revolution from an economic perspective. Clark Nardinelli makes the argument that the examination of child labor should begin with their primary economic role in the family, that is, as consumers. To counter the economic burden children place on the family, children should also be producers and make their contributions. Furthermore, the reality of the times was that many families and children were living in deplorable conditions even before industrialization and factory work started. Factory work, then, becomes more than an obligation for children to help balance the family Professor Ludwig von Mises suggests that this living standard caused the families to welcome factory work because “it saved them, in the strict sense of the term, from death by starvation” ( http://www.mackinac.org/article.aspx?ID=3879 ). Acknowledging the economic reality of the situation and the societal pressures of the times plays an important role in the rationalization of child labor. This being said, the rationality of the factors involved does not necessarily condone the outcome. We now turn to the advocates of reforming the child labor system used in Britain’s Industrial Revolution.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Slide 2: Advocates of Reform: Beginning in the 19 th century, conscientious individuals from a diverse range of backgrounds began to advocate reforms against the abusive treatment of children in the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 6

Western Civilization - project notes - Project Notes 1 2 3...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon bookmark
Ask a homework question - tutors are online