{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

FlanneryOConnorsAdvice

FlanneryOConnorsAdvice - Q W1 7W1 61(«Wm—m 3 d¢...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
Image of page 3

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
Image of page 5

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 6
Image of page 7

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
Image of page 9

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 10
Image of page 11
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Q W1 7W1 61 («Wm—m- 3 d¢ p45£~~m--W (irate- 1) :2. Wk" F’Wl {pelican-e VI 1- 2‘} fl" J _. r rate-an ' I: t l" 2>$axa~u2¢2 PatWM—t E [716. u.) E? Asian. J-. A: l qug Writing Short Stories FLANNERY O’CONNOR Writing class. I believe the teacher’s work is largel negative, that it is largely a matter of saying “This doesn’t work because . . .” or “This does work be- cause . . .” The because is very important. u teacher can help you understand the nature of yo I medium, and he can guide you in your reading. don’t believe in classes where students criticize each other’s manuscripts. Such criticism is generally it posed in equal parts of ignorance, flattery, and spite; It’s the blind leading the blind, and it can be dangerv ous. A teacher who tries to impose a way of writing on you can be dangerous too. Fortunately, most teach- ers I‘ve known were too lazy to do this. In any case,-I you should beware of those who appear overenerk getic. In the last twenty years the colleges have been emu phasizing creative writing to such an extent that you, almost feel that any idiot with a nickel’s worth of tal- ent can emerge from a writing class able to write a. competent story. In fact, so many people can now write competent stories that the short story as a me dium is in danger of dying of competence. We competence, but competence by itSelf is deadly. '- HAVE HEARD PEOPLE SAY THAT THE SHORT STORY one of the most difficult literary forms, and I’ve ;_'always tried to decide why people feel this way about 'what seems to me to be one of the most natural and fundamental ways of human expression.”F After all, In another mood on another occasion Fiannery O’Connor :. as follows: “I have very little to say about short-story “g. It’s one thing to write short stories and another thing talk about writing them, and I hope you realize that your ' g me to talk about story-writing is just like asking a fish _ lecture on swimming. The more stories I write, the more ' rious I find the process and the less I find myself capable ' analyzing it. Before I started writing stories, I suppose I d have given you a pretty good lecture on the subject, but I g produces silence like experience, and at this point I - very little to say about how stories are written.” get this from a writing class. 87 FLANNERY O’CONNOR you begin to hear and tell stories when you’re a child, and there doesn’t seem to be anything very compli- cated about it. I suspect that most of you have been telling stories all your lives, and yet here you sit— come to find out how to do it. Then last week, after I had written down some of these serene thoughts to use here today, my calm was shattered when I was sent seven of your manuscripts to read. After this experience, I found myself ready to ad- mit, if not that the short story is one of the most diffi- cult literary forms, at least that it is more difficult for some than for others. I still suspect that most people start out with some kind of ability to tell a story but that it gets lost along the way. Of course, the ability to create life with words is essentially a gift. If you have it in the first place, you can develop it; if you don’t have it, you might as well forget it. But I have found that the people who don’t have it are frequently the ones hell-bent on writing stories. I’m sure anyway that they are the ones who write the books and the magazine articles on how-to—write— short-stories. I have a friend who is taking a corre- spondenCe course in this subject, and she has passod a few of the chapter headings on to me——such as, “The Story Formula for Writers,” “How to Create 88] Writing Short Stories Characters,” “Let’s Plot!” This form of corruption is costing her twenty-seven dollars. I feel that discussing story-writing in terms of plot, character, and theme is like trying to describe the ex- pression on a face by saying where the eyes, nose, and mouth are. I’ve heard students say, “I’m very good with plot, but I can’t do a thing with character,” or, “I have this theme but I don’t have a plot for it,” and once I heard one say, “I’ve got the story but I don’t have any technique.” Technique is a word they all trot out. I talked to a writers’ club once, and during the question time, one good soul said, “Will you give me the technique for the frame-within-a—frame short story?” I had to admit I was so ignorant I didn’t even know what that was, but she assured me there was such a thing because she had entered a contest to write one and the prize was fifty dollars. But setting aside the people who have no talent for it, there are others who do have the talent but who flounder around because they don’t really know what a story 15. I suppose that obvious things are the hardest to de- fine. Everybody thinks he knows what a story is. But if you ask a beginning student to write a story, you’re liable to get almost anything—a reminiscence, an episode, an opinion, an anecdote, anything under the [89 FLANNERY O’CONNOR sun but a story. A story is a complete dramatic action -—and in good stories, the characters are shown through the action and the action is controlled through the characters, and the result of this is mean- ing that derives from the whole presented experience. I myself prefer to say that a story is a dramatic event that involves a person because he is a person, and a “particular person—that is, because he shares in the general human condition and in some specific human situation. A story always involves, in a dramatic way, the mystery of personality. I lent some stories to a country lady who lives down the road from me, and when she returned them, she said, “Well, them sto- ries just gone and shown you how- some folks would do,” and I thought to myself that that was right; when you write stories, you have to be content to start exactly them—showing how some specific folks will do, will do in spite of everything. Now this is a very humble level to have to begin on, and most people who think they want to write sto- ries are not willing to start there. They want to write about problems, not people; or about abstract issues, not concrete situations. They have an idea, or a feel- ing, or an overflowing ego, or they want to Be A Writer, or they want to give their wisdom to the world in a simple-enough way for the world to be able to absorb it. In any case, they don’t have a story and 90] Writing Short Stories they wouldn’t be Willing to write it if they did; and in the absence of a story, they set out to find a theory or a formula or a technique. Now none of this is to say that when you write a story, you are supposed to forget or give up any moral position that you hold. Your beliefs will be the light by which you see, but they will not be what you see and they will not be a substitute for seeing. For the writer of fiction, everything has its testing point in the eye, and the eye is an organ that eventually in- volves the whole personality, and as much of the world as can be got into it. It involves judgment. Judgment is something that begins in the act of vi- sion, and when it does not, or when it becomes sepa- rated from vision, then a confusion exists in the mind which transfers itself to the story. Fiction operates through the senses, and I think one reason that people find it SO difficult to write sto- ries is that they forget how much time and patience is required to convince through the senses. No reader who doesn’t actually experience, who isn’t made to feel, the story is going to believe anything the fiction writer merely tells him. The first and most obvious characteristic of fiction is that it deals with reality through what can be seen, heard, smelt, tasted, and touched. Now this is something that can’t be learned only in [91 FLANNERY O’CONNOR the head; it has to be learned in the habits. It has to become a way that you habitually look at things. The fiction writer has to realize that he can’t create com- ' passion with compassion, or emotion with emotion, or thought with thought. He has to provide all these things with a body; he has to create a world with weight and extension. I have found that the stories of beginning writers usually bristle with emotion, but whose emotion is often very hard to determine. Dialogue frequently proceeds without the assistance of any characters that you can actually see, and uncontained thOught leaks out of every corner of the story. The reason is usually that the student is wholly interested in his thoughts and his emotions and not in his dramatic action, and that he is too laZy or highfalutin to descend to the concrete where fiction operates. He thinks that judg- ment exists in one place and sense-impression in an- other. But for the fiction writer, judgment begins in the details he sees and how he sees them. 1 Fiction writers who are not concerned with theSe concrete details are guilty of what Henry James called “weak specification.” The eye will glide over their words while the attention goes to sleep. Ford Madox Ford taught that you couldn't have a man appear long enough to sell a newspaper in a story un- less you put him there with enough detail to make the reader see him. 92] Writing Short Stories I have a friend who is taking acting classes in New York from a Russian lady who is supposed to be very good at teaching actors. My friend wrote me that the first month they didn’t speak a line, they only learned to see. Now learning to see is the basis for learning all the arts except music. I know a good many fiction writers who paint, not because they’re any good at painting, but because it helps their writing. It forces them to look at things. Fiction writing is very seldom a matter of saying things; it is a matter of showing things. However, to say that fiction proceeds by the use of detail does not mean the simple, mechanical piling—up of detail. Detail has to be controlled by some overall purpose, and every detail has to be put to work for you. Art is Selective. What is there is essential and creates movement. Now all this requires time. A good short story should not have less meaning than a novel, nor should its action be less complete. Nothing essential to the main experience can be left out of a short story- All the action has to be satisfactorily accounted for in terms of motivation, and there has to be a beginning, a middle, and an end, though not necessarily in that order. I think many people decide that they want to write short stories because they’re short, and by short, they mean short in every way. They think that a short story is an incomplete action in which a very [93 FLANNERY O’CONNOR little is shown and a great deal suggested, and they think you suggest something by leaving it out. It’s very hard to disabuse a student of this notion, be- cause he thinks that when he leaves something out, he’s being subtle; and when you tell him that he has to put something in before anything can be there, he thinks you’re an insensitive idiot. Perhaps the central question to be considered in any discussion of the short story is what do we mean by short. Being short does not mean being slight. A Kr’s/hort story should be long in depth and should give u us an experience of meaning. I have an aunt who ' thinks that nothing happens in a story unless some- body gets married or shot at the end of it. I wrote a story about a tramp who marries an old woman’s idiot daughter in order to acquire the old woman’s au~ tomobile. After the marriage, he takes the daughter 0E on a wedding trip in the automobile and abandons her in an eating place and drives on by himself. Now that is a complete story. There is nothing more relat- ing to the mystery of that man’s personality that could be shown through that particular dramatiza- tion. But I’ve never been able to convince my aunt that it’s a complete story. She wants to know what happened to the idiot daughter after that. Not long ago that story was adapted for a televi- sion play, and the adapter, knowing his business, had the tramp have a change of heart and go back and 94] Writing Short Stories pick up the idiot daughter and the two of them ride away, grinning madly. My aunt believes that the story is complete at last, but I have other sentiments about it—which are not suitable for public utterance. When you write a story, you only have to write one story, but there will always be people who will refuse to read the story you have written. And this naturally brings up the awful question of what kind of a reader you are writing for when you write fiction. Perhaps we each think we have a per- sonal solution for this problem. For my own part, I have a very high opinion of the art of fictiOn and a very low opinion of what is called the “average” reader. I tell myself that I can’t escape him, that this is the personality I am Supposed to keep awake, but that at the same time, I am also supposed to provide the intelligent reader with the deeper experience that he looks for in fiction. Now actually, both of these readers are just aspects of the writer’s own perSQnal- ity, and in the last analysis, the only reader he can know anything about is himself. We all write at our own level of understanding, but it is the peculiar characteristic of fiction that its literal surface can be made to yield entertainment on an obvious physical plane to one sort of reader while the selfsame surface can be made to yield meaning to the person equipped to experience it there. Meaning is what keeps the short story from being [95 ERY O’CONNOR short. I prefer to talk about the meaning in a story rather than the theme of a story. People talk about the theme of a story as if the theme were like the string that a sack of chicken feed is tied with. They think that if you can pick out the theme, the way you pick the right thread in the chicken-feed sack, you can rip the story open and feed the chickens. But this is not the way meaning works in fiction. When you can state the theme of a story, when you can separate it from the story itself, then you can be sure the story is not a very good one. The meaning of a story has to be embodied in it, has to be made con- crete in it. A story is a way to say something that can’t be said any other way, and it takes every word in the story to say what the meaning is. You tell a story because a statement would be inadequate. When anybody asks what a story is about, the only proper thing is to tell him to read the story. The meaning of fiction is not abstract meaning but experi- enced meaning, and the purpose of making state— ments about the meaning of a story is only to help you _ to experience that meaning more fully. Fiction is an art that calls for the strictest attention to the real—whether the writer is writing a naturalis- tic story or a fantasy. I mean that we always begin with what is or with what has an eminent possibility of truth about it. Even when one writes a fantasy, re- 96] Writing Short Stories ality is the proper basis of it. A thing is fantastic be- cause it is so real, so real that it is fantastic. Graham Greene has said that he can’t write, “Lstood over a ‘- bottomless pit,” because that couldn’t be true, or “Running down the stairs I jumped into a taxi,” be- cause that couldn’t be true either. But Elizabeth Bowen can write about one of her characters that “she snatched at her hair as if she heard something in it,” because that is eminently possible. I would even go so far as to say that the person writing a fantasy has to be even more strictly atten- tive to the concrete detail than someone writing in a naturalistic vein—because the greater the story’s strain on the creduiity, the more convincing the prop- erties in it have to be. A good example of this is a story called “The Metamorphosis” by Franz Kafka. This is a story about a man who wakes up one morning to find that he has turned into a cockroach overnight, while not discarding his human nature. The rest of the story concerns his life and feelings and eventual death as an insect with human nature, and this situation is ac- cepted by the reader because the concrete detail of the story is absolutely convincing. The fact is that this story describes the dual nature of man in such a real- istic fashion that it is almost unbearable. The truth is _ not distorted here, but rather, a certain distortion is [97 FLANNERY O’CONNOR appearance is not the same thing as reality, then we must give the artist the liberty to make Certain rear- rangements of nature it these will lead to greater depths of vision. The artist himself always has to re- member that what he is rearranging is nature, and that he has to know it and be able to describe it accu~ rater in order to have the authority to rearrange it at all. The peculiar problem of the short-story writer is how to make the action he describes reveal as much of the mystery of existence as possible. He has only a short space to do it in and he can’t do it by statement. He has to do it by showing, not by saying, and by showing the concrete—so that his problem is really how to make the concrete work double time for him. In good fiction, certain of the details will tend to accumulate meaning from the action of the story it- self, and when this happens they become symbolic in the way they work. I once wrote a story called “Good Country People,” in which a lady PhD. has her wooden leg stolen by a Bible salesman whom she has tried to seduce. Now I’ll admit that, paraphrased in this way, the situation is simply a low joke. The aver- age reader is pleased to observe anybody’s wooden leg being stolen. But without ceasing to appeal to him and without making any statements of high intention, uls‘ednto get aththewtrnhthm, If we admit, as we must, that 98] Writing Short Stories this story does manage to operate at another level of experience, by letting the wooden leg accumulate meaning. Early in the story, we‘re presented with the fact that the PhD. is spiritually as well as physically crippled. She believes in nothing but her own belief in nothing, and we perceive that there is a wooden part of her soul that corresponds to her wooden leg. Now of course this is never stated. The fiction writer states as little as possible. The reader makes this con- nection from things he is shown. He may not even know that he makes «the connection, but the connec- tion is there nevertheless and it has its efiect on him. As the story goes on, the wooden leg continues to ac- cumulate meaning. The reader learns how the girl feels about her leg, how her mother feels about it, and how the country woman on the place feels about it; and finally, by the time the Bible salesman comes along, the leg has accumulated so much meaning that it is, as the saying goes, loaded. And when the Bible salesman steals it, the reader realizes that he has taken away part of the girl’s personality and has re- vealed her deeper affiiction to her for the first time. If you want to say that the wooden leg is a symbol, you can say that. But it is a wooden leg first, and as a wooden leg it is absolutely neCessary to the story. It has its place on the literal level of the story, but it operates in depth as well as on the surface. It in- [99 FLANNERY O’CONNOR creases the story in every direction, and this is essen- tially the way a story escapes being short. Now a little might be said about the way in which this happens. I wouldn’t want you to think that in that story I sat down and Said, “I am now going to write a story about a PhD. with a wooden leg, using the wooden leg as a symbol for another kind of afflic— tion.” I doubt myself if many writers know what they are going to do when they start out. When I started writing that story, I didn’t know there was going to be a PhD. with a wooden leg in it. I merely found myself one morning writing a description of two Women that I knew something about, and before I realized it, I had equipped one of them with a daugh- ter with a wooden leg. As the story progressed, I brought in the Bi...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern