chap9 - Chapter 9 Adjusting for a Factor 9.1 Study...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Chapter 9 Adjusting for a Factor 9.1 Study Suggestions Simpsons paradox and standardized rates constitute a nice completion to the argument, begun in Chap- ter 7, that it is difficult to interpret the findings of an observational study. The real importance of Simpsons paradox rests in the following realization. The 2 2 table of any ob- servational study can be viewed as a collapsed ta- ble. The researcher must always remember that there could exist a meaningful factor for which uncollaps- ing the table would result in a reversal of the di- rection of the relationship between the response and populations. The main problem my students have with Simp- sons paradox and standardized rates is in keeping the roles of the three variables straight. There is a response, there is a variable, that defines the pop- ulations to be compared, and there is a factor that may influence the response. For example, for the data on page 295 of the text, the response is the at- titude toward drinking and driving. The populations consist of female and male drivers. Finally, it was conjectured that drinking frequency would influence response, so the factor was taken to be drinking fre- quency. Simpsons paradox can occur, and standardized rates will yield interesting insight, only if the factor is strongly related (statistically) to both the popula- tion and the response. For example, if women and men had the same distribution of drinking frequen- cies then computing the standardized rates would be a waste of time. (If men and women have the same weights, the standardized rate would equal the orig- inal rate, since there would be no effect of replacing the womens weights with the mens weights, or vice versa, since the weights are identical.) Moreover, if attitude were not related to drinking frequency, then the proportion of successes, for either gender, would be the same in each drinking frequency cate- gory. Thus, the weights used would have no impact, since we would be computing weighted averages of identical numbers. If you use the Mantel-Haenszel test to analyze data from an observational study, remember that there is not necessarily a single correct analysis strategy. Consider, for example, the study of how attitude to- wards drinking and driving depends on gender that is analyzed in the text in Chapter 9. If a researcher simply wants to compare females and males there is no need to consider using the techniques discussed in Chapter 9. If, however, the researcher wants to in- vestigate the extent to which differences in attitude are due to differences in the frequency of drinking alcohol, then the techniques of Chapter 9 may prove helpful. In this latter case, the researcher will need tohelpful....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 10/23/2009 for the course STAT STATS 371 taught by Professor Professorwardrop during the Fall '09 term at Wisconsin.

Page1 / 4

chap9 - Chapter 9 Adjusting for a Factor 9.1 Study...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online