Absorpsion vs Variable Costing

Absorpsion vs Variable Costing - Julio Garcia Tuesdays...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Julio Garcia Tuesdays @ 6:00pm Text Problem 9-33 Comparison of Variable and Absorption Coating Income Statement for 2003 using Variable Costing: Sales 25,000,000 x $2.00 50,000,000.00 Production Costs: Variable 30,000,000 x $1.00 30,000,000.00 Fixed 8,400,000.00 38,400,000.00 Ending Inventory 5,000,000 units 5,000,000.00 Cost of Goods Sold 33,400,000.00 Gross Margin 16,600,000.00 Marketing, Distribution, Customer Service costs: Variable 12,500,000.00 Fixed 4,100,000.00 16,600,000.00 Operating Income 0.00 Absorption Costing: Sales 20,000,000 x $2.00 40,000,000.00 Production Costs: Variable 15,000,000 x $1.00 15,000,000.00 Fixed 8,400,000.00 23,400,000.00 Ending Inventory 5,000,000 units 6,400,000.00 Cost of Goods Sold 29,800,000.00 Gross Margin 10,200,000.00 Marketing, Distribution, Customer Service costs: Variable 10,000,000.00 1- As a member of the board, I would raise the problems that surface when using Absorption Costing in order to measure Net Income. I w members that the use of absorption costing was the only reason the new president's plan was able to generate a net income of $1,400,00 recognition of the fixed costs allocated to the remaining 5,000,000 units of Inventory, the new president simply moved $1,400,000 of cost o...
View Full Document

Page1 / 8

Absorpsion vs Variable Costing - Julio Garcia Tuesdays...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online