Case Study houston - Case Study Houston Exploration...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Case Study Houston Exploration Acquisition or Share Buyback? Prof. Ian Giddy , New York University The Proposal In May 2006, the Board of Directors of Houston Exploration (THX) was presented with a choice. With even higher prices of energy on the horizon, expansion of the company's natural gas business seemed logical. On the other hand, a vocal minority of shareholders was calling for a share repurchase instead of a growth strategy. The activist shareholders, represented by the hedge fund Jana Partners, made the following points: An approximately $650 million share repurchase will create significantly more shareholder value than using these proceeds to pursue long-lived onshore acquisitions in today's highly competitive M&A environment. As set forth in the attached analysis, we believe that the Company could repurchase approximately 37% of the outstanding shares (slightly less than 11 million shares) paying a 15% premium to the recent market price. This would be achieved by using estimated net cash proceeds of approximately $520MM from the recent Louisiana Gulf of Mexico sale in addition to $130 million of debt (leaving the Company with the same leverage ratio of approximately 1.0x estimated 2007 EBITDA that it had prior to paying down debt with the proceeds of the Texas Gulf of Mexico sale). The acquisition scenario yields significantly less EPS accretion -- only 14% compared to 45% in the buyback scenario. The Company should also implement a comprehensive hedging strategy. By doing so, the Company can place a "collar" on a significant portion of 2007 and 2008 natural gas volumes, which would be beneficial given that our projections are based upon the lower-end of what the Company would likely be able to secure as a floor on such a "collar" transaction. In other words, implementing a hedging program such as this would preserve significant commodity price upside while locking-in cash flows that already translate into a deeply discounted relative and absolute valuation. Given the Company's historical underperformance that the Board should explore possible strategic transactions to maximize value, including a potential sale. We believe there are numerous interested acquirers. A Board of Directors that "plays possum" in response to shareholder initiatives represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship of a board to their shareholders. Shareholder demands for value maximization are not a threat to be avoided. Instead they are an opportunity to work collaboratively to achieve the best possible returns for the company's true owners, which is a board's highest duty. The Analysis Share Repurchase Scenario 2007E EPS Impact assuming share Pro repurchase Current Buyback Forma Cash (including LA GOM proceeds after tax & hedge buyback) $520 ($520) $0 Total Debt $424 $130 $554 Net Debt (Cash) ($96) $650 $554 assume 15% premium
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Share Price $52.75 $61 $52.75 Shares Outstanding 29.3 (11) 18.6 Equity Market Capitalization $1,546
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/29/2009 for the course FINANCE 502 taught by Professor Gore during the Spring '09 term at Bahcesehir University.

Page1 / 22

Case Study houston - Case Study Houston Exploration...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online