Reputation_and_Philanthropy_ss

Reputation_and_Philanthropy_ss - REPUTATION is sticky -it...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
REPUTATION is sticky -- it is costly to change, and tends to act as if it resists change. REPUTATION-SETS Stakeholder groups perceive the reputations of the Frm according to the issues they hold important. Thus, Frms can have multiple reputations, depending on issue. We call a group of stakeholders that perceive the reputation of the Frm on a particular issue, a reputation-set . Note that the members of a reputation-set may differ on the Frm’s reputation in regard to the issue.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
REPUTATIONAL OPTIMALITY or REPUTATIONAL BLISS is that condition that ensues when all reputation-sets (i.e., across all stakeholders and all issues) facing the Frm hold positive affect toward the Frm and the Frm’s positions are driven by deontological decision making. A simple way to express this is: All stakeholders have positive views of the Frm, and the Frm is seeking to do the right thing. Why Give to Charity? Public image (goodwill)
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/29/2009 for the course BUSENV 0060 taught by Professor Barrymitnick during the Fall '09 term at Pittsburgh.

Page1 / 4

Reputation_and_Philanthropy_ss - REPUTATION is sticky -it...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online