HO2-sol

# HO2-sol - MATH 238 WINTER 2009 PROBLEM SET 2 SOLUTIONS...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MATH 238 WINTER 2009 PROBLEM SET 2 - SOLUTIONS Problem 1 Derive the put-call parity relation using the Black-Scholes equation and then give a no-arbitrage interpretation of it. Solution Let C ( x,t ) and P ( x,t ) denote the solutions of the Black-Scholes equation with terminal condition C ( x,T ) = ( x- K ) + and P ( x,T ) = ( K- x ) + , respectively. Consider the function f ( x,t ) = C ( x,t )- P ( x,t ) Since C ( x,t ) and P ( x,t ) both satisfy the Black-Scholes PDE, f ( x,t ) also satisfies the Black-Scholes PDE. The terminal condition is f ( x,T ) = C ( x,T )- P ( x,T ) = x- K . Now consider the function g ( x,t ) = x- Ke − r ( T − t ) Computing the partial derivatives, we have ∂g ∂t =- rKe − r ( T − t ) ∂g ∂x = 1 ∂ 2 g ∂x 2 = 0 Thus ∂g ∂t + 1 2 σ 2 ( x,t ) x 2 ∂ 2 g ∂x 2 + rx ∂g ∂x- rg = 0 , so g ( x,t ) also satisfies the Black-Scholes PDE. The terminal condition is g ( x,T ) = x- K . Thus f ( x,t ) and g ( x,t ) both satisfy the Black-Scholes PDE with the same terminal condition. So by the uniqueness of solutions of the Black-Scholes PDE, and setting x = S ( t ), the stock price at time t , we conclude that f ( S,t ) = g ( S,t ). This results in the put-call parity: C ( S,t )- P ( S,t ) = S- Ke − r ( T − t ) . A no-arbitrage interpretation of this relation may be given as follows: Consider two portfolios where the first portfolio is long one European call option and short one European put option with the same strike K and maturity T . The second portfolio consists of the underlying asset S ( t ) (long) and is short an amount of cash which equals Ke − r ( T − t ) at time t . Then both portfolios have the same payoff S ( T )- K at time T . Thus in the absence of arbitrage their values must be the same at all earlier times t ≤ T , for otherwise there would be an arbitrage opportunity from buying the portfolio with the smaller value at time t and short-selling the portfolio with the larger value, which would result in an immediate positive cash flow. Liquidation of the positions at expiration time T generates zero cash flow, hence there would have been a riskless profit contradicting the no-arbitrage assumption. Problem 2 (a) Use the formula for the explicit solution of the BS equation to price one call option today, where S (0) = \$850, the strike time is three months, the strike price is K = \$950, the volatility is 40% and the interest rate is 1%. (b) Plot this price as a function of the volatility from 15% to 60%. (c) Calculate the hedge ratio one month before the strike time for (a). (d) What is the price of a put with the same parameters as (a)? (e) What is the price of a put with parameters as in (a) except that K = \$750?...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 11/08/2009 for the course MATH 238 taught by Professor Papanicolaou during the Winter '08 term at Stanford.

### Page1 / 6

HO2-sol - MATH 238 WINTER 2009 PROBLEM SET 2 SOLUTIONS...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online