# QMB09sol_1 - Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 1 Fall...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 1 Fall 2009 1. Liboff, problem 11.27 on page 498. (a) Let A be an hermitian operator. We first demonstrate that ( e iA ) † = e- iA . To prove this, we use the series expansion that defines the exponential, e iA = ∞ summationdisplay n =0 ( iA ) n n ! . The sum converges for any operator A . Then, e- iA = ∞ summationdisplay n =0 ( − iA ) n n ! = ∞ summationdisplay n =0 [( iA ) † ] n n ! = bracketleftBigg ∞ summationdisplay n =0 ( iA ) n n ! bracketrightBigg † = ( e iA ) † , where we have used the fact that ( iA ) † = − iA † = − iA , since A is hermitian. In the above derivation, we have also used the fact that ( A + B ) † = A † + B † , which also holds for the sum of an infinite number of terms, assuming that the sum converges. A unitary operator hatwide U is defined as an operator that satisfies hatwide U hatwide U † = hatwide U † hatwide U = I , where I is the identity operator. Defining hatwide U ≡ e iA , we see that: hatwide U hatwide U † = e iA ( e iA ) † = e iA e- iA = e i ( A- A ) = e = I . (1) In this derivation, I used the fact that for any two operators A and B , 1 e A e B = e B e A = e A + B , if and only if AB = BA . (2) This result applies in eq. (1) since iA and − iA clearly commute. Finally, we use the fact that e = I , where 0 is the zero operator, which is again a consequence of the definition of the exponential of an operator via its series expansion. Setting A = − hatwide Ht/ planckover2pi1 , we note that if hatwide H is hermitian, then so is A . It then follows that hatwide U = exp( − i hatwide Ht/ planckover2pi1 ) is unitary. (b) Given | ψ ( t ) ) = hatwide U | ψ (0) ) , it follows that ( ψ ( t ) | = ( ψ (0) | hatwide U † . Hence, using the results of part (a), ( ψ ( t ) | ψ ( t ) ) = ( ψ (0) | U † U | ψ (0) ) = ( ψ (0) | I | ψ ) = ( ψ (0) | ψ (0) ) . That is, the normalization of ψ is independent of the time t . 1 For a proof of eq. (2), see, e.g., Jacob T. Schwartz, Introduction to Matrices and Vec- tors (Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2001) pp. 157–159, which can be viewed at http://books.google.com . 2. Liboff, problem 11.39 on page 512. (a) We are given a wave function of a rigid rotator, ψ ( t ) = 1 √ 14 1 2 3 e- iEt/ planckover2pi1 , E ≡ planckover2pi1 2 /I . Using the results of Liboff, problem 11.38, we can write at time t = 0: 1 √ 14 1 2 3 = − 1 √ 7 ξ (0) x + 1 √ 7 ( √ 2 − 1) ξ (- 1) x + 1 √ 7 ( √ 2 + 1) ξ (1) x , where, ξ (0) x ≡ 1 √ 2 1 − 1 , ξ (- 1) x ≡ 1 2 1 − √ 2 1 , ξ (1) x ≡ 1 2 1 √ 2 1 , are eigenstates of hatwide L x , with eigenvalues, 0, − planckover2pi1 and + planckover2pi1 , respectively. Note that the ξ ( m ) x are all eigenstates of vector L 2 with eigenvalue 2 planckover2pi1 2 . Thus, ψ ( t ) = bracketleftbigg − 1 √ 7 ξ (0) x + 1 √ 7 ( √ 2 − 1) ξ (- 1) x...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 11/09/2009 for the course PHY 4604 taught by Professor Mucciolo during the Spring '09 term at University of Central Florida.

### Page1 / 9

QMB09sol_1 - Physics 139B Solutions to Homework Set 1 Fall...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online