Phil 264 Quiz 4 - regards it as a statement of fact_7 Ayer would claim that the following is perhaps emotionally but not factually significant(a

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Philosophy 264: Quiz 4 True/False ___1. According to Ayer, if a statement is theoretically verifiable, then it is factually significant. ___2. According to Ayer, it is "self-stultifying" to hold that all factually significant statements are verifiable in the weak sense. ___3. Ayer believes that it is silly to regard scientific generalizations and historical claims as an "important" kind of non-sense. Instead, they should be viewed as factually significant. ___4. According to Ayer, the word 'substance' derives its meaning from the fact that it refers to a "simple" non-empirical (because unobservable) entity. ___5. For Ayer, the grammaticality of a sentence guarantees its meaningfulness. Multiple/Choice ___6. According to Ayer's Criterion of Verifiability , a sentence is factually significant, for a given person, if and only if that person: (a) has made observations that confirm/disconfirm it (b) knows what observations would confirm/disconfirm it (c)
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: regards it as a statement of fact. ___7. Ayer would claim that the following is perhaps emotionally, but not factually, significant: (a) God loves us (b) Torture is morally wrong (c) both (a) and (b). ___8. When someone insists that a certain painting is "real" in the sense of having a mind-independent existence then, according to Ayer, the statement is: (a) not factually significant (b) factually significant (c) analytic. ___9. When someone insists that a certain painting is "real" in the sense of being non-hallucinatory then, according to Ayer, the statement is: (a) not factually significant (b) factually significant (c) analytic. ___10. According to Ayer, metaphysicians are: (a) like poets in that their statements are meaningless (b) like mystics in that their statements are of moral/aesthetic value (c) unlike either poets or mystics in that their statements are neither meaningful nor of moral/aesthetic value....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/15/2009 for the course PHIL 264 taught by Professor Reimer during the Spring '07 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online