This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Upasana Sonik Global 110 Lezra TA: Jayne Lee Sect: Thurs 7-750 Week 6 reading notes: Wilkins begins his book by stating the beliefs of terrorists as to why they believe that their act of terrorism is justified. He questions why is terrorism wrong? He answers this question by replying with the idea that there is threat or harm, and threats are a species of coercion. An example of two kidnappings of William Randolph Hearst and his daughter, Patricia Hearst, are used to exemplify the difference between primary and secondary targets of terrorism. The first chapter of the book, talks about if and when can terrorism be justified. One main point he makes in this chapter is that not every act that terrifies people is an act of terrorism. Examples that supported this statement were the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, also an example of a rapist coercing his victim. Wilkin's believes that acts of terrorism’s objectives are an alteration of social and political policy. He implies that an act of terrorism can be justified if it is carried out social and political policy....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/17/2009 for the course LAWSO 151 taught by Professor Hajjar during the Spring '08 term at UCSB.
- Spring '08