eco331-04-ExpectedUtilityHandout

eco331-04-ExpectedUtilityHandout - Overview Preferences...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–7. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Overview Preferences Choice under Risk and Uncertainty Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications Eco331: Preferences and Expected Utility Marciano Siniscalchi October 5, 2009 Overview Preferences Choice under Risk and Uncertainty Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications Overview Preferences and Representation Certainty, Risk, and Uncertainty Preferences over random variables The St. Petersburg Paradox Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications, including forecasts Overview Preferences Choice under Risk and Uncertainty Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications Preferences Definition Let F be a set of alternatives . A preference on F is a binary relation < F F . A preference < on F is: complete if, for all x , y F , either x < y or y < x ; transitive if, for all x , y , z F , x < y and y < z imply x < z . Your intermediate-micro preference Actually, also the most general definition. Will get more specific theories by choosing F . Two main tenets of economic analysis Preferences are assumed observable Any claim should be interpretable in terms of preferences. Overview Preferences Choice under Risk and Uncertainty Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications Notation and Examples x < y x is as least as good as y weak preference x y x is strictly better than y strict preference x y x is as good as y indifference Examples: F = { ( x , y ) : x , y { 1 ,..., 5 }} . Interpret ( x , y ) F as x apples and y bananas. A preference statement: (3 , 2) < (2 , 3). Note: preference = binary relation = set. If < is complete, it contains at least 24 + 23 + 22 + ... + 2 + 1 pairs! Overview Preferences Choice under Risk and Uncertainty Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications Representation This suggests that listing < is tedious. Definition A representation of a preference < on the set F is a function U : F R such that x , x F , x < x if and only if U ( x ) U ( x ) . Example: U (( x , u )) = 3 x- 5 y . 3 3- 5 2 =- 1, 3 2- 5 3 =- 9: (3 , 2) (2 , 3) Representations are invariant to strictly increasing transformations Example: V (( x , y )) = [ U (( x , y ))] 3 . Overview Preferences Choice under Risk and Uncertainty Expected Utility Certainty Equivalent Applications The Knightian Taxonomy X : set of prizes , or ultimate outcomes Can assume X = R : monetary outcomes . Certainty: F X . Risk: Random variables as probability distributions over X . Objective probabilities: objects of choice Notation: F ( X ); p , q F , traditionally called lotteries . Uncertainty: Random variables as functions from some S to X . Subjective probability: representation of preferences Notation: F X S ; f , g F , traditionally called acts ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 11/17/2009 for the course ECONOMICS 331 taught by Professor Marciano during the Spring '09 term at Northwestern.

Page1 / 24

eco331-04-ExpectedUtilityHandout - Overview Preferences...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 7. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online