{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

eco331h2solution

# eco331h2solution - HOMEWORK 2 SOLUTIONS Northwestern...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

HOMEWORK 2 SOLUTIONS Northwestern University Marciano Siniscalchi Fall 2008 Econ 331-0 1. Forecasting and Random Variables The individual minimizes s P ( { s } )[ X ( s ) - ξ ] 2 with respect to ξ . Differentiating with respect to this variable yields s P ( { s } )2[ X ( s ) - ξ ]( - 1) = 0; dividing by two, recognizing that s P ( { s } ) ξ = ξ and rearranging terms yields the required result. 2. Forecasting and Expected Utility Suppose π is not admissible, so there is ρ such that L ρ ( s ) < L π ( s ) for all s S . Then W - L ρ ( s ) > W - L π ( s ) for all s , so u ( W - L ρ ( s )) > u ( W - L π ( s )) for all s because u is strictly increasing. But then E[ u ( W - L ρ )] > E[ u ( W - L π )], so the individual strictly prefers to provide the forecast system ρ rather than the forecast system π . It follows that, if a forecast system π maximizes the individual’s expected utility, it must be admissible. 3. Expected Utility Calculations (i) Write U ( Z ) for the expected utility of the generic lottery Z . Then we have U ( X ) = 1 3 100 + 1 3 50 + 1 3 0 5 . 69036; the certainty equivalet C[ X ] of X

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}