This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: HOMEWORK 2 SOLUTIONS Northwestern University Marciano Siniscalchi Fall 2008 Econ 3310 1. Forecasting and Random Variables The individual minimizes s P ( { s } )[ X ( s ) ] 2 with respect to . Differentiating with respect to this variable yields s P ( { s } )2[ X ( s ) ]( 1) = 0; dividing by two, recognizing that s P ( { s } ) = and rearranging terms yields the required result. 2. Forecasting and Expected Utility Suppose is not admissible, so there is such that L ( s ) < L ( s ) for all s S . Then W L ( s ) > W L ( s ) for all s , so u ( W L ( s )) > u ( W L ( s )) for all s because u is strictly increasing. But then E[ u ( W L )] > E[ u ( W L )], so the individual strictly prefers to provide the forecast system rather than the forecast system . It follows that, if a forecast system maximizes the individuals expected utility, it must be admissible. 3. Expected Utility Calculations (i) Write U ( Z ) for the expected utility of the generic lottery Z . Then we have U ( X ) = 1 3...
View
Full
Document
 Spring '09
 Marciano
 Economics

Click to edit the document details