This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Chapter 20 NAME Cost Minimization Introduction. In the chapter on consumer choice, you studied a con- sumer who tries to maximize his utility subject to the constraint that he has a fixed amount of money to spend. In this chapter you study the behavior of a firm that is trying to produce a fixed amount of output in the cheapest possible way. In both theories, you look for a point of tangency between a curved line and a straight line. In consumer theory, there is an indifference curve and a budget line. In producer theory, there is a production isoquant and an isocost line. As you recall, in consumer theory, finding a tangency gives you only one of the two equations you need to locate the consumers chosen point. The second equation you used was the budget equation. In cost-minimization theory, again the tangency condition gives you one equation. This time you dont know in advance how much the producer is spending; instead you are told how much output he wants to produce and must find the cheapest way to produce it. So your second equation is the equation that tells you that the desired amount is being produced. Example. A firm has the production function f ( x 1 ,x 2 ) = ( x 1 + 3 x 2 ) 2 . The price of factor 1 is w 1 = 1 and the price of factor 2 is w 2 = 1. Let us find the cheapest way to produce 16 units of out- put. We will be looking for a point where the technical rate of sub- stitution equals w 1 /w 2 . If you calculate the technical rate of sub- stitution (or look it up from the warm up exercise in Chapter 18), you find TRS ( x 1 ,x 2 ) = (1 / 3)( x 2 /x 1 ) 1 / 2 . Therefore we must have (1 / 3)( x 2 /x 1 ) 1 / 2 = w 1 /w 2 = 1. This equation can be simplified to x 2 = 9 x 1 . So we know that the combination of inputs chosen has to lie somewhere on the line x 2 = 9 x 1 . We are looking for the cheapest way to produce 16 units of output. So the point we are looking for must sat- isfy the equation ( x 1 + 3 x 2 ) 2 = 16, or equivalently x 1 + 3 x 2 = 4. Since x 2 = 9 x 1 , we can substitute for x 2 in the previous equation to get x 1 +3 9 x 1 = 4. This equation simplifies further to 10 x 1 = 4. Solving this for x 1 , we have x 1 = 16 / 100. Then x 2 = 9 x 1 = 144 / 100. The amounts x 1 and x 2 that we solved for in the previous para- graph are known as the conditional factor demands for factors 1 and 2 , conditional on the wages w 1 = 1, w 2 = 1, and output y = 16. We ex- press this by saying x 1 (1 , 1 , 16) = 16 / 100 and x 2 (1 , 1 , 16) = 144 / 100. Since we know the amount of each factor that will be used to pro- duce 16 units of output and since we know the price of each factor, we can now calculate the cost of producing 16 units. This cost is c ( w 1 ,w 2 , 16) = w 1 x 1 ( w 1 ,w 2 , 16)+ w 2 x 2 ( w 1 ,w 2 , 16). In this instance since w 1 = w 2 = 1, we have c (1 , 1 , 16) = x 1 (1 , 1 , 16) + x 2 (1 , 1 , 16) = 160 / 100....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/21/2009 for the course ECON 420k taught by Professor Clements during the Spring '07 term at University of Texas at Austin.
- Spring '07