Bio 1b lab report 2 - Jan-Kristine Bayabo Samuel Regalado...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Jan-Kristine Bayabo Samuel Regalado Katherine Bai Jessica Daud Amie Cai October 14, 2009 Bio 1B – Section 125 Simulated Factors in Predator / Prey Population Growth in Three Cases: Camouflage-Dependent Dominance, Predation Probability Based Reproduction, and Predator – Prey Interdependence Abstract : To test our own hypotheses of camouflage favored dominance and predator-prey dependence, we performed three experiments designed to take into account camouflage, vulnerability to predation, and cycles of both prey and predators. Our data shows the most camouflaged prey increased most in population size while the most conspicuous decreased. The data also shows that in the experiment where reproduction depends on vulnerability, the more conspicuous and better camouflaged preys switched dominance after 5 generations. Lastly, a decrease in prey as predators increase and an increase in prey as the predators decrease in population size. For the most part our hypotheses were correct. Because some prey are more visibly available, they tend to be found and eaten faster by predators, causing the decrease in population of more conspicuous prey. Also, because it is unlikely all populations increase at the same rate, the second and third parts of the experiment reflected a more realistic sense of reproduction, where preys don’t exhibit identical rates of reproduction and where predators do not just multiply, but depend on prey consumption enabling or disabling its population growth. Introduction : The members and gene pool of a population is variable depending on the habitat that the population is located at and the predators there. Natural selection breeds for members of the population who can more easily escape predators and survive to the next breeding season. Thus, the members that survive will be able to pass on their genes and the specific traits that allow those members to survive will be multiplied through their offspring. The members that do not have the traits that will allow greater survival will be eliminated from the gene pool much quicker and as a result, there will be a smaller percentage of the resultant population with those traits. It was found that when the habitat and season during which the sticklebacks lived had certain predators, a greater percentage of that population would have the specific traits that allow them to survive better (Reimchen, Nosil 2002). Population sizes also vary, usually in a cyclical format. There are many possible theories which account for these cyclical fluctuations with the size of the population, some of which are quantity and quality of foodstuff, predator population size, and population interaction. In studies that focus on the relationship between the population and the predators, there has been a slight lag time of the relative size of the population with the predators compared with the prey. For instance, in one of the studies compiled
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 11/23/2009 for the course BIO 1B taught by Professor Carlson,mischel,power during the Fall '07 term at University of California, Berkeley.

Page1 / 8

Bio 1b lab report 2 - Jan-Kristine Bayabo Samuel Regalado...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online