hw7-sol - EE 278 November 20, 2009 Statistical Signal...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: EE 278 November 20, 2009 Statistical Signal Processing Handout #19 Homework #7 Solutions 1. Convergence examples. Consider the following sequences of random variables defined on the probability space ( , F , P), where = { , 1 , . . ., m- 1 } , F is the collection of all subsets of , and P is the uniform distribution over . X n ( ) = braceleftBigg 1 n = n mod m otherwise Y n ( ) = braceleftBigg 2 n = 1 otherwise Z n ( ) = braceleftBigg 1 = 1 0 otherwise Which of these sequences converges to zero (a) with probability one, (b) in mean square, and/or (c) in probability? Justify your answers. Solution (15 points) First consider X n . Since X n ( ) is either 0 or 1 n , X n ( ) 1 n for every . Therefore lim n X n ( ) = 0 for every . Thus P { : lim n X n ( ) = 0 } = P() = 1 , which shows that X n 0 with probability one. Now consider convergence in mean square. E(( X n- 0) 2 ) = summationdisplay x X x 2 p X ( x ) = 0 P { X n = 0 } + 1 n 2 P { X n = 1 n } = 1 n 2 P { = ( n mod m ) } = 1 n 2 1 m . Obviously, lim n 1 mn 2 = 0 , so X n 0 in mean square. This implies that X n 0 in probability also. Next consider Y n . For any epsilon1 > 0, lim n P {| Y n- | > epsilon1 } = lim n P { Y n > epsilon1 } = lim n P { Y n = 2 n } = P { = 1 } = 1 m negationslash = 0 . Thus Y n negationslash 0 in probability. Since convergence with probability 1 implies convergence in probability, Y n negationslash 0 with probability 1. Similarly, Y n negationslash 0 in mean square. Finally consider Z n , which is independent of n . For any epsilon1 such that 0 < epsilon1 < 1, lim n P {| Z n- | > epsilon1 } = lim n P { Z n > epsilon1 } = P { Z i = 1 } = P { = 1 } = 1 m negationslash = 0 . Thus Z n negationslash 0 in probability, hence Z n negationslash 0 either with probability 1 or in mean square. Comments: X n also converges to 0 in distribution since it converges in probability. Y n does not converge in any sense. To show this it suffices to show that it does not converge in distribution. But P { Y n y } 1- 1 m < 1 for every y < , so the limit of F Y n is not a cdf at all. Z n converges in every sense to the nonzero random variable Z defined by Z ( ) = braceleftBigg 1 = 1 0 otherwise This convergence is immediate since Z n = Z for every n . 2. Convergence with probability 1. Let X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , . . . be i.i.d. random variables with X i Exp( ). Show that the sequence of random variables Y n = min { X 1 , . . ., X n } converges with probabil- ity 1. What is the limit? Solution (10 points) For any values of { X n } , the sequence of Y n values is monotonically decreasing in n . Since the random variables are 0, we know that the limit of Y n is 0. We suspect that Y n 0. To prove that Y n converges w.p.1 to 0, we show that for every epsilon1 > 0, lim m P {| Y n- | < epsilon1...
View Full Document

Page1 / 15

hw7-sol - EE 278 November 20, 2009 Statistical Signal...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online