Unformatted text preview: TEAM WORKSHOPS
In order to create accountability for workshop interaction, peers report on peer activity. Previously, I’d had students make photocopies of all the comments they wrote on the paper; this created additional photocopy expenses for those who worked the most diligently. In order to cut this expense, we’re going to experiment with peer evaluations. Each of your peers should have provided you with both written and spoken feedback. Please provide a quick evaluation of peer comments on your work. My Name ___________________ My Team ______________________ Class Time (circle one) 9:30 or 1:30 Team Member NAME ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ SPOKEN FEEDBACK
Great OK Not Helpful None Provided Great WRITTEN FEEDBACK
OK Not Helpful None Provided TEAM ONE BALZER, John BARTSCH, Matt BECKER, Joe BOULWARE, Paul TEAM TWO DEHNER, Ricky DYSERT, Kevin FERNALLD, Brian GEORGE, Matt HELSER, Audra TEAM THREE KEMP, Ryan KUHN, Matt LAM, Kin MCDONALD, Kevin TEAM FOUR MORRISON, Chris RUTAN, Brad STECHSCHULTE, Lance TEAM FIVE VANG, Jonathan WAKEFIELD, Michael WEATHERS, Greg YODER, Andrew CROCKETT, David ...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 11/30/2009 for the course ENGINEER 367 taught by Professor Minor during the Spring '09 term at Ohio State.
- Spring '09