mgcr222_reflection_paper

mgcr222_reflection_paper - Part I. Observation The one...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Part I. Observation The one experience from our interactive classes which significantly affected my view of the potential applications of organizational behaviour concepts was the most recent “Survival!” exercise. Its results appeared to be very meaningful to me as they evoked various thoughts on the upsides and downsides of group decision making and inspired me with excitement at the possibilities of effective problem solving in team environment. In this activity our entire class was divided in groups of four people, and we all were given handouts with instructions. The problem assumed a fictional setting in which every participant becomes a member of a lunar exploration crew ordered to meet with a mother ship at a particular spot on the moon surface. Due to unexpected technical problems, the crew’s ship was damaged and they had to land quite far from the meeting spot; the participant’s survival depends on reaching the aforementioned rendezvous place. Given the list of undamaged items that were left, everybody had to rank them independently by decreasing level of importance, on scale of 1 to 15, to select those which would more likely aid in reaching the ship. For future references, the list included exactly 15 things: matches, food concentrate, rope, parachute silk, portable heater, pistols, dehydrated milk, oxygen tanks, map of constellations, life raft, magnetic compass, water supply, signal flares, first aid kit and radio transceiver. On the first thought, this task did not pose much difficulty to me, since I have a good background in sciences; I presently study engineering and sure can figure what will be of little use on the moon. After everyone was finished ranking individually, we were asked to discuss our choices within our own group and make a team decision about ranking. I approached this part very responsively, playing a highly task-oriented role by supporting the members’ arguments which seemed more logical than mine and giving reasons about the items that to me seemed inapplicable in the described setting. Since we already knew each other to some extent, I felt quite open and enthusiastic; thus, it was a lively, fruitful discussion. Katie and Courtney, our CC’s, then revealed the expert ranking, and
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
we calculated the total absolute differences between this (expert) and our rankings, individual and group ones separately. As it turned out, my individual score was only “average”, whereas the group score was almost “excellent”. The benefits of group decision making were clearly evident,
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 6

mgcr222_reflection_paper - Part I. Observation The one...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online