equivalent happiness

equivalent happiness - o Similarly, it may be better to...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Philosophy 1317:  Business Ethics There is an important distinction to be made between the value of a person’s  happiness (the value or disvalue of her/his pleasures or pains) and the value  of enhancing or detracting from the person’s happiness (causing her/him to  experience pleasure or pain). E.g.: o It may well be bad/wrong to engage in action A, which results in an  increase in the happiness of person X (who is guilty of murder, say),  even though X’s happiness has the same positive value as anyone  else’s happiness. o It may be good/right to engage in action B, which results in a decrease  in X’s happiness (an increase in her/his misery), even though X’s  misery has the same negative value as anyone else’s misery.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: o Similarly, it may be better to perform action C, enhancing deserving person Ys happiness more than others, but not because happiness in Y has a greater positive value than it does in others (rather, it will because Y has done something to merit unequal treatment, or because that unequal treatment will indirectly involve an increase of the general happiness. Failure to mark this distinction, I believe, is the main source of reluctance to accept our default assumption, that no ones happiness is any more or any less important than anyone elses, that everyones happiness should get equal consideration....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/09/2009 for the course PHIL 1317 taught by Professor Nenadpopovic during the Spring '08 term at SMU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online