Griswald v. Connecticut

Griswald v. Connecticut - Question Presented Does the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 (1965) Docket Number: 496 Abstract Argued: March 29, 1965 Decided: June 7, 1965 Subjects: Judicial Power: Standing to Sue, Personal Injury Facts of the Case Griswold was the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Both she and the Medical Director for the League gave information, instruction, and other medical advice to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and her colleague were convicted under a Connecticut law which criminalized the provision of counselling, and other medical treatment, to married persons for purposes of preventing conception.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Question Presented Does the Constitution protect the right of marital privacy against state restrictions on a couple's ability to be counseled in the use of contraceptives? Conclusion Though the Constitution does not explicitly protect a general right to privacy, the various guarantees within the Bill of Rights create penumbras, or zones, that establish a right to privacy. Together, the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, create a new constitutional right, the right to privacy in marital relations. The Connecticut statute conflicts with the exercise of this right and is therefore null and void....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/14/2009 for the course GOVT 32 taught by Professor Lind during the Spring '09 term at École Normale Supérieure.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online