{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Grutter v. Bollinger - Grutter v Bollinger 539 U.S 306(2003...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Grutter v. Bollinger 539 U.S. 306 (2003) Docket Number: 02-241 Abstract Decided: June 23, 2003 Argued: April 1, 2003 Facts of the Case In 1997, Barbara Grutter, a white resident of Michigan, applied for admission to the University of Michigan Law School. Grutter applied with a 3.8 undergraduate GPA and an LSAT score of 161. She was denied admission. The Law School admits that it uses race as a factor in making admissions decisions because it serves a "compelling interest in achieving diversity among its student body." The District Court concluded that the Law School's stated interest in achieving diversity in the student body was not a compelling one and enjoined its use of race in the admissions process. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that Justice Powell's opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), constituted a binding precedent establishing diversity as a compelling governmental interest sufficient under strict scrutiny review to justify the use of racial preferences in admissions. The appellate court also
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Spring '09
  • Lind
  • Sandra Day O'Connor, Grutter v. Bollinger, Clarence Thomas, University of Michigan Law School, Michigan Law School

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online