0846781264 - I was of the opinion that this period was very...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
From: Keith Briffa <k.briffa@uea.ac.uk> To: tatm@insec.quorus.e-burg.su Subject: the Yamal data Date: Thu Oct 31 12:01:04 1996 Dear Rashit, In looking at the data I now see that you have only sent data from abot 350bc onwards. What is the situation with the earlier data. I am very interested in the details of the 1st millennium B.C. and especially this period from about 500 to 100 B.C. We still have a gap in the Tornetrask data at about 350 B.C.
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: I was of the opinion that this period was very low growth in the chronology of yours shown by Stepan in Cambridge - but it does not seem so low in the chronology he gave me. What are your thoughts on this and is it possible to get the earlier data when you are happy with them?Thanks very best wishes Keith...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/16/2009 for the course CLMT 0032456 taught by Professor Ellison during the Spring '09 term at Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online