Krajewski IN Supplement A - Supplement A Decision Making A...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Supplement A Decision Making A. Break-even Analysis 1. Evaluating services or products a. We assume total costs equals fixed costs; which do not vary with volume, plus variable costs; which vary linearly with volume. b. Introduce with Example A.1: Finding the Break-Even Quantity Algebraic approach: c p F Q cQ F pQ- = + = c. Break-even quantity: Graphic Approach (refer to Figure A.1 and show PowerPoint). d. Sensitivity analysis with Example A.2 2. Application A.1: Finding the Break-Even Analysis for Evaluating Products or Services for an in-class exercise of graphical solution, algebraic solution, and sensitivity analysis. (Note: The expected demand increase is not quite enough to break even.) The Denver Zoo must decide whether to move twin polar bears to Sea World or build a special exhibit for them and the zoo. The expected increase in attendance is 200,000 patrons. The data are: Revenues per Patron for Exhibit Gate receipts $4 Concessions $5 Licensed apparel $15 Estimated Fixed Costs Exhibit construction $2,400,000 Salaries $220,000 Food $30,000 Estimated Variable Costs per Person Concessions $2 Licensed apparel $9 Is the predicted increase in attendance sufficient to break even? A-1 A-2 Supplement A Decision Making a. Graphical solution of Denver Zoo problem Q TR = pQ TC = F + cQ $0 $2,650,000 250,000 $6,000,000 $5,400,000 Where p = 4 + 5 + 15 = $ 24 F = 2,400,000 + 220,000 + 30,000 = $ 2,650,000 c = 2 + 9 = $ 11 b. Algebraic solution of Denver Zoo problem pQ = F + cQ 24 Q = 2,650,000 + 11 Q 13 Q = 2,650,000 Q = 203,846 3. Evaluating processes a. We assume that the make versus buy or process 1 versus process 2 decision does not affect revenues. Supplement A Decision Making A-3 b. The decision alternative is indicated on the basis of the lowest total costs at the expected volume. c. Use Application A.2: Evaluating Processes: Make or Buy Example At what volume should the Denver Zoo be indifferent between buying special sweatshirts from a supplier or have zoo employees make them?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/19/2009 for the course MANAGEMENT 00123 taught by Professor Ahmed during the Spring '09 term at Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences.

Page1 / 7

Krajewski IN Supplement A - Supplement A Decision Making A...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online