Solutions_HW1

Solutions_HW1 - Solutions to HW 1 Anukriti Sharma February...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Solutions to HW 1 Anukriti Sharma February 3, 2009 Question 1 . 1. Two possible reasons are: Icelandic banking sector was huge relative to the economy, unlike the US case. As a result, US government could meet its obligations, while Iceland couldnt. Icelandic banks took a lot of foreign deposits, denominated in forex. On the other hand, deposits in the US banks were dollar denominated and the government could just print money in order to repay. 2. (a) Icelandic government should keep the size of the banking sector small relative to the size of its economy. (b) Banks can be allowed to stop withdrawals (or allow only a few) legally in case of bank runs. Secondly, bank deposits could be denominated in Icelandic currency instead of forex, so that government has an option of printing more money. Question 2 . 1. g ( x,y ) = c ax + by = c y = c b- a b x . So, we can rewrite the maximization problem as Max x x [ c b- a b x ]. FOC: c b- 2 a b x = 0 x * = c 2 a Substituting x * in the constraint gives: y * = c 2 b 2. Assume c > 0. The Lagrangian for this problem is:0....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/21/2009 for the course ECON 1211 taught by Professor Govel during the Spring '08 term at Columbia.

Page1 / 6

Solutions_HW1 - Solutions to HW 1 Anukriti Sharma February...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online