SN1101E - India - Democracy in India SN1101E Structure...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Democracy in India SN1101E Structure India's constitution draws strongly from its colonial predecessor, the 1935 Government of India Act. It should be noted, however, that the constitution was not entirely neutral: the provisional government (drawing up the constitution) was dominated by the Indian National Congress, and Congress leaders effectively set the course for the debate and influenced the final form of the constitution . Ostensibly the Indian constitution has certain Socialist leanings, although how far this manifests in practice has varied across the past decades, as well as according to leadership; where the economy is concerned, for instance, Nehru strongly advocated a central authority and strong regulation, but Shastri was much more supportive of private enterprises and diminished central planning. Under the constitution, the formal head-of-state is the president, who holds similar (particularly in its symbolism) powers to the British monarch. The president is elected by members from Parliament and state legislature, and is subsequently entitled to appoint the prime minister and Council of Ministers. He also holds several other constitutional powers, including the ability to dissolve Parliament, declare a state of emergency, and veto parliamentary bills. It should be noted, however, that much like the British monarch, the president's powers are largely exercised on the advice of the Council of Ministers, itself dominated by the prime minister. The president does not so much influence the cabinet as provide affirmation for its actions and composition. This is not to say that the Indian president is merely a figurehead. There have been times where the president has had to intervene following inconclusive elections, acting as an arbiter and guide during power vacuums . Following the collapse of the BJP government in 1979, for instance, President Reddy appointed Charan Singh as prime minister. When Singh resigned three weeks later due to his inability to form a workable government, Reddy invited him to oversee a caretaker government. This interim government held power until the 1980 elections. Similarly, President Sharmar stepped in several times following the confusion of the 1996 national elections, likewise to identify the best candidates to form a government. The Indian president used to wield a fairly controversial power; this was the power to suspend or abrogate freedom–on the prime minister's advice–when faced with a grave emergency , wherein India's security was threatened by external aggression or internal disturbance . However, following Indira Gandhi's 1975 attempt to have the president declare such an emergency in response to political opposition, the constitution was amended to grant the president such powers only when faced with external aggression. While the Indian president wields considerably more power in practice than he does in theory, the contrary is
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/11/2010 for the course SAS SN1101E taught by Professor Kripasridharan during the Fall '09 term at National University of Singapore.

Page1 / 5

SN1101E - India - Democracy in India SN1101E Structure...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online