PS1101E - Finals - There are three main goals that states...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Goals of states There are three main goals that states strive towards: security, power, and prosperity. For a state, security involves securing its territory and preventing its encroachment. This also helps to ensure state sovereignty. (see security ) There are two ways in which a state might be concerned with power. For one, states seeks to preserve their power; this might be accomplished, for instance, by laying down rules to govern the use of violence within its territory. However, states might also want to expand their power in some way. Greater economic power, for instance, could contribute to security, because it provides the means of acquiring more advanced military technology. This is not to say that it is disadvantageous to be a less powerful state, since their actions are less likely to be scrutinised. They could also manipulate stronger states into helping them meet their own needs, as Laos has done with Vietnam and China. The third goal, prosperity, will enable a state to improve its citizens' standard of living. It is true that material wealth might not be sufficient to ensure happiness. However, as with greater economic power, it could provide the means to acquiring other ends. The goals of states are important to international relations because it demonstrates how states have similar aims. This could give rise to tension, as with the security dilemma, or to greater stability, as when states engage in collective security. Security For a state, security involves securing its territory and preventing is encroachment. Security is important in international relations because of the anarchical international system. Without a central authority, every state is entitled to govern its territory, but is simultaneously responsible for its own security. This gives rise to the security dilemma, where states worry about (1) how to interpret the behaviour of other states, and (2) how other states view their behaviour, since defensive behaviour is potentially offensive. Security is one of a state's three goals, the other two being power and prosperity. Arguably, though, both power and prosperity can also serve as means to bolster a state's security. Security dilemma The security dilemma arises from a state's difficulty in deciding how o defend itself. The state has to ensure: (1) It does not appear too weak. While this means it does not pose a threat to other countries, it is also dangerous to appear as an easy military target. (2) It does not appear too strong, since this might antagonise other states, inciting them to attack peremptorily The security dilemma is a result of the decentralisation of power in the international system. While every state possess the independence to act as it pleases, the same is true for other states, so the flip side of this independence is that states live under an anarchical self-help system where they are fully responsible for their own survival. This might encourage states to adopt a pessimistic view of inter-state relations, where
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/11/2010 for the course PS PS1101E taught by Professor Erikmobrand during the Fall '09 term at National University of Singapore.

Page1 / 7

PS1101E - Finals - There are three main goals that states...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online