F4160-4

# F4160-4 - 4 Mean-Variance Analysis and Portfolio Separation...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

4. Mean-Variance Analysis and Portfolio Separation 4.1. Motivation Accepting the expected utility maximization framework, we now discuss the conditions for mean-variance analysis to be valid. An individual’s utility function may be expanded as a Taylor series around his expected end-of-period wealth (assume the Taylor series converges): u ( f W ) = u ( E ( f W )) + u 0 ( E ( f W ))( f W E ( f W )) + 1 2 u 00 ( E ( f W ))( f W E ( f W )) 2 + R 3 where R 3 = P n =3 1 n ! u ( n ) ( E ( f W ))( f W E ( f W )) n and u ( n ) ( · ) is the n th derivative of u ( · ) . Since the expectation and summation operators are interchangeable, the individual’s expected utility can be expressed as E ( u ( f W )) = u ( E ( f W )) + 1 2 u 00 ( E ( f W )) σ 2 ( f W ) + E ( R 3 ) (4.1) where E ( R 3 ) = X n =3 1 n ! u ( n ) ( E ( f W )) m n ( f W ) (4.2) and m n ( f W ) = E (( f W E ( f W )) n ) is the n th central moment of f W . Note that equation (4.1) indicates a preference for expected wealth and an aversion to variance of wealth for an individ- ual having an increasing and strictly concave utility function. However, equation (4.2) shows that expected utility cannot be de fi ned solely over the expected value and variance of wealth for arbitrary distributions and preferences, as indicated by the remainder term which involves higher order terms. Therefore, to motivate the mean-variance model, we need at least one of the following: 1. Quadratic preferences (for arbitrary distributions): u ( f W ) = f W b 2 f W 2 Under quadratic preferences, the third and higher order derivatives of u ( · ) are zero. That is, E ( R 3 ) = 0 and E ( u ( f W )) = E ( f W ) b 2 E ( f W 2 ) = E ( f W ) b 2 ³ ( E ( f W )) 2 + σ 2 ( f W ) ´ Therefore, when E ( f W ) and σ 2 ( f W ) are fi nite, quadratic utility is su cient (in fact, necessary for arbitrary distributions) for mean-variance analysis. 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Remark 1. Some undesirable properties are: a. Satiation: An increase in wealth beyond the satiation point decreases utility. b. Increasing absolute risk aversion in wealth: R A ( f W ) u 00 ( f W ) u 0 ( f W ) = b 1 b f W d R A ( f W ) d f W = b 2 (1 b f W ) 2 > 0 This implies that risky assets are inferior goods. 2. Rates of return follow a multivariate normal distribution (for arbitrary preferences): In general, a su cient condition for mean-variance framework is that ( µ, σ ) can com- pletely characterize the feasible choices, and such two-parameter distributions are closed ( stable ) under linear combinations, i.e., X, Y F aX + bY F Remark 2. A disadvantage of using normal distribution is that it is unbounded from below. This is inconsistent with limited liability and with economic theory, which at- tributes no meaning to negative consumption. De fi ne the relationship between wealth and return as e r f W W 0 W 0 = f W W 0 1 with µ E ( e r ) = E ( i W W 0 1) and σ 2 σ 2 ( e r ) = σ 2 ( i W ) W 2 0 . To show the representation of going from u ( f W ) to v ( µ, σ 2 ) , we can write the utility function as u ( · ) = u ( e r ; µ, σ 2 ) E ( u ( · )) = Z −∞ u ( e r ; µ, σ 2 ) f ( e r ; µ, σ 2 ) d e r Standardize e r by de fi ning e z = h r µ σ . Then e r = µ + σ e z , which implies that e z = ± when e r = ± , and d e r = σd e z . By change of variable, f ( e r ; µ, σ 2 ) = 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern