PS2006_Paranoia_and_Reasons_for_Beliefs - PS2006 Induced...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: PS2006 Induced Paranoia and Justifications for Personal Beliefs Abstract Objectives, Design, Methods, Results, Conclusions Background The following section gives you an introduction to the literature. By all means use this as a source for writing up your own introduction, however, you MUST NOT copy this. Your introduction must be written in your own words. Extra marks will be offered to those who show evidence of further reading. Begin your introduction by reviewing the literature. Include research on self- consciousness/self-reference in people with delusions. Include research on reasoning in people with delusions. Include some information on the continuity model of psychosis. Write a paragraph which justifies why this study was carried out previous literature has revealed x and y, but so far z has not been examined, therefore the current study will attempt to fill this gap in the literature. In outlining the rationale, make sure you tell the reader just what the aims of the study are. Finish off with the hypothesis. The continuity model of mental illness (e.g. Claridge, 1988; Claridge & Beech, 1995; Galbraith, Manktelow & Morris, in press) contends that psychotic symptoms are continuous with normality: at one end of the continuum lie normal healthy cognitions and behaviour, at the opposite end of the spectrum lie the characteristics of mental illness. However, mild or sub-clinical versions of psychotic characteristics can be found, to varying degrees, across the spectrum. This sub-clinical category of psychotic behaviour is referred to as schizotypy (Claridge, 1988; Meehl, 1962, 1990). By this rationale, many of the symptoms of mental illness are common in people without diagnoses, albeit in moderate form, and hence may be adaptive and beneficial. In line with the continuity model of mental illness, the current study investigates sub-clinical Paranoia and its effect upon everyday reasoning. Sass and Parnas (2003) argue that people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia experience an exaggerated self-consciousness or hyperreflexivity (Sass, 1992), which is characterised by an excessive tendency to focus awareness upon the self. They propose that this extreme self-focus can lead to a profound disorder of the self (ipseity disturbance), or to a disruption of what is otherwise our tacit sense of awareness. Sass and Parnas (2003) propose that hyperreflexivity, rather than heightening ones sense of self, actually lessens it. Drawing on the work of Polanyi (1964, 1967), they argue that tacitness is central to our sense of self, because that which we know tacitly is that which we inhabit. Hence selfhood is not characterised by a separate process of self- monitoring, or self-consciousness, rather selfhood is prereflective. Sass and Parnas (2003) propose that the early stages of schizophrenia are characterised by hyperreflexivity whereby afflicted individuals increasingly come to scrutinise aspects of the self to the extent that they become alien, detached and objectified. of the self to the extent that they become alien, detached and objectified....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/26/2010 for the course SAS Various taught by Professor Various during the Three '09 term at University of Wollongong, Australia.

Page1 / 14

PS2006_Paranoia_and_Reasons_for_Beliefs - PS2006 Induced...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online