This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: 1. Is it correct to say that ~ ~ A is a vector field that is perpendicular to ~ A because it is a cross product of ~ and ~ A ? Answer: Answer is NO! For example, one can show ~ ~ A is not necessarily perpendicular to the vector ~ A , as one would expect from a cross product. We will show this by an explicit construction. Choose ~ A = ay i + bx j + c k ; where a , b and c are nonzero positive constants. ~ ~ A = ( a + b ) k . The scalar product of ~ ~ A and ~ A is ( a + b ) c 6 = 0. The field lines of the vector field ~ A look like a cork screw and its curl points towards the advancing direction of the screw given by the right hand rule. On the other hand the field also has a nonzero component in the direction in which the screw advances. It is not surprising that they are not perpendicular. What then makes ~ ~ A a vector field? ~ ~ A is a vector field because its components transform like one. For a similar reason ~ ~ A is not a simple dot product. For example, ~ ~ A 6 = ~ A ~ . It is a scalar field because it does not change under a general rotation in the three dimensional space. 1 2. A charge Q is distributed uniformly over a sphere of radius R. Express the resulting volume charge density involving Dirac function. Answer: The charge density is independent of the angles and and a function of r alone, i.e. ( ~ r ) ( r ). Charge density is zero for all values of r except at r = R . When charge density is integrated over all space (integration over the entire domains of and gives 4 ,) one must get the total charge Q . Thus the integration of ( r ) over r is finite even though the function is nonzero only ar r = R . It is possible only if charge density has an integrable....
View Full
Document
 Spring '09
 Gangopashyaya
 Magnetism

Click to edit the document details