prelims_Micro Prelim ANSWERS August 2006

prelims_Micro Prelim ANSWERS August 2006 - Microeconomics...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Microeconomics Prelim August 31, 2006 Answer Keys 1. 1(a). Case 1: σ > 1. In this case the utility function is strictly quasiconcave, and, because all prices are equal and the utility function is symmetric in x 1 , …, x L , the consumer demands the same amount of every commodity or variety, i.e., her Walrasian demand for variety j is Lp w , j = 1,…, L . Hence she reaches the utility level p w L p w L Lp w L Lp w L Lp w L i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- σ-- σ σ- σ σ- σ σ σ- σ- σ σ = σ- σ = = = = ∑ , an expression that is increasing in L when σ > 1. Hence, in this case more variety is good for the consumer. Case 2: σ ∈ (0,1). As in Case 1, the utility function is strictly quasiconcave and the consumer reaches the utility level p w L 1 1- σ , an expression that is now decreasing in L . Hence, in this case more variety hurts the consumer. Case 3: σ < 0. Now the utility function is strictly quasiconvex, and all the solutions to the utility maximization problem are of the corner variety, with the consumer buying only one good. Thus, she reaches the utility level p w p w = - σ σ σ- σ 1 1 , independent of L . Hence, in this case more variety neither benefits nor hurts the consumer. 1(b). The solution to the utility maximization problem for (1) is the same as the one for the usual CES function 1 1 1- σ σ = σ- σ ∑ L i i x , (2) because (1) is an increasing transformation of (2). Hence, ( 29 σ-- = σ- ∑ = j L i i L j p p w w p p x 1 1 1 1 ) , ,..., ( ~ , with elasticity ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 σ-- = σ-- σ-- = σ- σ-- σ-- = σ- ∑ ∑ ∑ σ- + σ-- = ∂ ∂ j L i i j j L i i j j L i i j j j j p p w p p p p p p w x p p x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 ) ( ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ~ ~ = ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ σ--- =---- =---- =---- =--- =---- =- ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 ) 1 ( ) 1 ( L i i j j L i i j j L i i j L i i j j L i i p p p p p p p p p p p p ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/09/2010 for the course ECON 200D taught by Professor Pontusrendahl during the Winter '06 term at UC Davis.

Page1 / 15

prelims_Micro Prelim ANSWERS August 2006 - Microeconomics...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online