This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: ― despite perhaps lowered mobility ― and thus less resistive or ohmic loss.) 0.467eV 0.347eV 0.754eV 2 III. (25 points) Problem 5.27 of text. Again assume complete ionization on both sides. (… or more roughly note that L D is around an order of magnitude smaller than W.) 3 IV. (25 points) Problems 5.35 of text. Note that x x x x x x x x e e e e x x e e x e e x ) sinh( ) cosh( ctnh(x) & 2 ) cosh( , 2 ) sinh( Also be careful of notation: Here x n is just x on the nside and x n = 0 is the nside edge of the depletion region (not x n = x n,o as in figures in the text). And p n is the equilibrium value of the minority hole concentration (what I have labeled p nside,o in my notes)....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 02/09/2010 for the course EE 339 taught by Professor Banjeree during the Fall '08 term at University of Texas at Austin.
 Fall '08
 Banjeree

Click to edit the document details