This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: plus one penny. Show that a clever trader could extract all of Pam’s money (one penny at a time) by offering her a sequence of trades. Answer: This exercise gives an example where violation of transitivity can lead to implausible results. Suppose b=chocolate bars, p=peanuts and l=licorice. Her preferences are: This means that you can give her first peanuts. Then take a penny from her and exchange the peanuts with a chocolate since she likes it more. Then take a penny and trade chocolate with licorice. Then take another penny and trade the licorice with peanuts. Repeat until you get all her money. If transitivity is violated this could actually happen. Therefore this is an example of things that could go wrong when transitivity is not satisfied....
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 02/10/2010 for the course IEOR 3600 taught by Professor Chudnovsky during the Winter '09 term at Columbia.
 Winter '09
 chudnovsky

Click to edit the document details