Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CHAPTER 2 THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDITING ENVIRONMENT Answers to Review Questions 2-1 During the late 1990s and early 2000s, accounting firms aggressively sought opportunities to expand their business in nonaudit services such as consulting. This expansion from their core audit practice, combined with allegations of auditors refusing to challenge management’s actions, resulted in conflict between regulators and the accounting profession. A result was that new SEC guidelines for materiality, independence, and the disclosure of audit service fees were established. However, subsequent financial fiascos such as those at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, and many others, caused investors to doubt the fundamental integrity of the financial reporting system. Under pressure to restore the public’s confidence, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and created the PCAOB in 2002. 2-2 The accounting profession’s expansion into new areas, combined with changes in the overall business environment, resulted in new regulations and guidelines. The scandals of the late 1990s and early 2000s brought into the question the profession’s ability to self- regulate, resulting in new legislation. While these changes have caused pain and turmoil, they highlight the essential importance of auditing in our economic system. Ultimately, the “back to basics” emphasis, along with auditing firms’ renewed focus on thorough and effective financial statement audits, will likely prove healthy for the U.S. financial reporting system and for the profession. Further, somewhat ironically the SOX-mandated audit of internal control over financial reporting has brought significant new revenues to accounting firms. 2-3 The essential components of the high-level model of business offered in the chapter are: corporate governance, objectives, strategies, processes, controls, transactions, and financial statements. Corporate governance is carried out by management and the board of directors in order to ensure that business objectives are carried out and that company assets are safeguarded. To achieve its objectives, management must formulate strategies and implement various processes which are in turn carried out through business transactions. The entity’s information and internal control systems must be designed to ensure that these transactions are properly executed, captured, and processed in order to produce accurate financial statements. It is important that the auditor obtain a firm understanding of these components in order to understand relevant risks and to plan the nature, timing, and extent of the audit so that it is efficient and effective. 2-4 The information system must maintain a record of all businesses transactions. It should be capable of producing accurate financial reports to summarize the effects of the entity’s transactions. Among other things, internal control is required to ensure that a proper environment is established and that transactions are appropriately conducted and recorded...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/14/2010 for the course BUSINESS ACCT320 taught by Professor Unknown during the Winter '10 term at Davenport.

Page1 / 8


This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online