# GMAT Tip - I just got my official score this afternoon and...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

I just got my official score this afternoon and wanted to share the experience and strategies I used on the test. I've been mostly a lurker here but the tips on this board really helped out (especially in finding out which practice tests were good predictors of your score and which ones over/underestimated). So I wanted to give back. I've listed my own test taking and prep experience below. I got a 760 (99%), 51Q (99%), 44V (97%), and 6.0/6.0 AWA (90%) by taking a very systematic approach to each of the sections. Of course, the validity of these tips will depend on your own studying style and goals. But this is what I did and it worked for me, so it might work for some of you too. I have it formatted and broken down by section for ease of readability. ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT 1. Analysis of an Argument This question will give you a short paragraph, typically about a business-oriented subject (like business operations, pay, profit, etc.), and will ask you (a) whether you think it's a good argument, (b) why or why not, and (c) anything that could be added to make it stronger. I will answer (a) right now: it's not a good argument. In fact, it's an extremely poorly constructed argument. You can probably find 4-5 egregious, damaging flaws in the paragraph that make its conclusion pretty much wholly invalid. My suggestion is pick your favorite 3 flaws and run with them. If you're the kind of person who likes to rain on people's parades, you'll like this question a lot. I know I did. Treat this like a critical reasoning weaken question. I'll get more into this in the third section, but normally when I go through multiple choice verbal questions I try to answer the prompt even before reading the answers. If you have enough practice doing that, you'll find yourself answering this question pretty comfortably.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
I followed a very simple template for answering this question. I listed numbers 1-3 on my scratch paper, and under each number I had the following sub-bullets: * Succinct description of the flaw (e.g. "Confuses profits with sales") * Counter example that would make his conclusion invalid (e.g. "High costs would yield very low profit, despite high sales") * A way to make the argument better (e.g. "Had he discussed costs in his statement then his argument would have been more sound") Devote a sentence or two to each of those bullet points, and that's it, you have three body paragraphs! Just slap on a short introduction at the top and a conclusion at the bottom and you're good to go. These don't have to be artistic or well constructed or anything like that. In fact, I think my intro was something like "This argument is flawed because it relies on three important assumptions. Any loosening of the assumptions would make his argument less sound". I didn't even specifically discuss the prompt in my intro. In the conclusion, state your three reasons succinctly.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 02/15/2010 for the course MATH dsfs taught by Professor Fdsf during the Spring '10 term at École Normale Supérieure.

### Page1 / 7

GMAT Tip - I just got my official score this afternoon and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online