Unformatted text preview: 2 , (2) where α, β, γ are unknowns. Find numerical values for α, β, γ so that in terms of the new variable X , Eq. (1) becomes ˙ X = r + X 2 + O ( ε 3 ) . (3) (c) Solve Eq. (2) to ﬁnd an explicit expression for X in terms of x . (d) There’s a simpler way to deﬁne X in terms of x and r which gives Eq. (1) with no error terms . What is it? (e) Extra credit: If ε = 1 / 10 , roughly how big is the size of the O ( ε 3 ) remainder in Eq. (3)? Hint: First, ﬁnd the exact formula for the transformed equation ˙ X = F ( X, r ) . Since X = x + O ( ε 2 ) , it’s reasonable to guess that | X | is not much bigger than | x | itself, say | X | ≤ cε for some reasonably small value of c . (You will have to guess a value for c .) How big can | r + X 2-F ( X, r ) | get for | X | ≤ cε and | r | ≤ ε ? A numerical estimate (by plugging in a few values of X and r ) is ﬁne....
View Full Document
- Spring '10
- Math, Bifurcation theory, Saddle-node bifurcation, error terms, saddle-node normal form