Homework4_Solution

# Homework4_Solution - ECE 3040B Dr. Alan Doolittle...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ECE 3040B Dr. Alan Doolittle Microelectronic Circuits Homework #4 Solutions Due 2/28/01 1.) Pierret 5.3 This problem is a practical example of a “High-Low” (high doping to low doping) junction. This type of junction is often used with a p-n junction to improve the performance of the metal contacts at the ends of the diode. (b) Start with either Jp=0 or Jn=0 (similar to equation 5.6) and solve for E (eq. 5.7). 2.) Pierret 5.5 3.) a.) Given, −1 2 D n n i2 D p ni + where I o = qA Ln N A L p N D kT I o is the " reverse saturation current" I = Io e qV A We have all parameters necessary except the diffusion coefficients and diffusion lengths. But, 1000(0.0259) = 25.9 cm 2 / S for electrons kT = q 250(0.0259 ) = 6.475 cm 2 / S for holes Ln, p = Dn, pτ n , p = 25.9(10e − 6 ) = 0.0161 cm for electrons 6.475(1e − 6 ) = 0.00254 cm for holes 2 2 2 Dn ni2 D p ni 25.9(1e10) 6.475(1e10) I o = qA + = 1.6e − 19(0.00456 ) + Ln N A L p N D 0.0161(1e18) 0.00254(1e14 ) I o = 1.86e − 12 A or 1.86 pA b.) If a positive voltage is applied to the “p-side” the diode is forward biased. + VA - Dn, p = µ n , p c.)Consider the law of the junction on either side of the depletion region, At x = − x p At x = xn p = p o + ∆p n p= but p = NA np = ni2 e but , n = ND so, qV A ni2 n 2 qVA + i e kT − 1 ND ND np = ni2 e kT ni2 n 2 qVA + i e kT − 1 NA NA n= ni2 qVA kT e ∆p n ( x = x n ) = −1 ND −1 n = no + ∆n p kT n e NA qVA ∆n p ( x = − x p ) = 2 i so, qV A kT ( + 0.35 np = (1e10) 2 e 0.0259 = 7.4e25 cm −3 which is much greater than in equilibrium no po = ni2 = 1e 20 cm −3 Note that I could have well asked you the what the excess carrier concentration was at the depletion region edges. In that case the answer would not be identical on opposite sides of the depletion region due to differences in doping on the two sides. d.) If a positive voltage is applied to the n-type side of the junction, the diode is reverse biased. e.) As follows from part c, np = n i2 e qV A kT np = (1e10) 2 e − 0.35 0.0259 ( = 1.4e14 cm − 3 which is much less than in equilibrium n o p o = ni2 = 1e20 cm −3 f.) Since in equilibrium (no bias), no excess minority carriers are injected from the ptype side, the hole concentration is merely, po=ni2/ND = 1e6 cm-3 . For the forward bias case in part b, excess minority carriers are injected across the junction and recombine in the n-type quasi-neutral region as they move away from the junction. As derived in class the expression for the excess hole concentration is, qVA ni2 ∆p n ( x' ) = e kT − 1 e (− x '/ LP ) ND for x' ≥ 0 or e 0.35 1e14 ∆p n ( x' = 1um) = 7.3e11 cm −3 0.0259 − 1 e ( −[1e− 4cm / 0.016cm ]) ∆p n (1e10)2 ( x' = 1um) = For the reverse bias case in part c, minority carriers are stripped away from the depletion region edges by the electric field. Thus, ) ) qVA ni2 ∆p n ( x' ) = e kT − 1 e ( − x '/ LP ) ND for x' ≥ 0 or e −0.35 0.0259 1e14 ∆p n ( x' = 1um) = −9.9e5 cm −3 − 1 e ( −[1e− 4 cm / 0.016cm ]) ∆p n (1e10)2 ( x' = 1um) = You will notice that this is almost all the minority carriers we have in this region (~po). It should make since that you can never take away more carriers than you had in equilibrium. However, in the previous forward bias case (see above) you can add more minority carriers. 4.)Consider the following plots to scale of the diode current, I=1e-13(eVa/0.0259-1) 2 Current [A] 2.5 8.0E-07 Current [A] 1.0E-06 6.0E-07 4.0E-07 2.0E-07 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.0E+00 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -2.0E-07 -0.4 0 -0.8 0.4 0.8 -2 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -0.5 -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 Voltage [V] Voltage [V] 1.0E+02 1.0E+00 Current [A] 1.0E-02 1.0E-04 1.0E-06 1.0E-08 1.0E-10 1.0E-12 -2 -1.5 -1 1.0E-14 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Voltage [V] a.) From the curve with a maximum current scale (y-axis maximum) or 1e-6 A, the turn on voltage appears to be ~0.4V b.) From the curve with a maximum current scale (y-axis maximum) or 2.5 A, the turn on voltage appears to be ~0.8V c.) When the data is plotted in a semi-log plot, it is clear that the diode current is continuously increasing with increasing forward bias. However, changes in current from say, 1e-10 A to 1e-8A are not noticeable on the linear scale. Thus, for the linear scales, when the currents approach the range of the scale maximum, the current rapidly increases with increasing voltage, thus, appearing to “turn on” the diode. 5.) Consider the following expressions for the junction capacitance and the built in voltage. NN kT ln A 2 D q ni or, qK S ε o N A N D 1 2 ( N A + N D ) kT NN ln A 2 D − V A q ni C junction = A Vbi = qK S ε o N A N D 1 2 ( N A + N D ) (V bi − V A ) C junction = A using numeric values making sure to use the correct units for the dielectric constant, 1 1e18 N D 0.0259 ln (1e10) 2 1.6e − 19(11.8)8.85e − 14 1e18 N D 2 (1e18 + N D ) − (−3) or N D = 5.5e15 cm − 3 b.) What is really being asked here is to take the large signal solution (bias point of the diode) and determine the small signal capacitance and resistance at that bias condition. From part a, Cdiode=50pF. Making use of the fact that the diode current in reverse bias is essentially the negative of the saturation current, the resistance of the diode is, RDiode = 1 / g d = VT 0.0259 ≈ =∞ ID + IS − IS + IS c.) The output voltage, Vout, for the time varying input signal, VAC, can be found by noticing that Vout is part of a reactive voltage divider (that is a voltage divider that uses complex impedances). Note: due to a typing error, L1=L3. Thus, 1 jϖ C Diode 1 1 Vout = V AC = = 2 1 1 − ϖ L1C Diode 1 − (2.5e − 14)ϖ + jϖ L1 jϖ C Diode This type of circuit would have “infinite” voltage gain at a specific frequency, when w2=1/L1Cdiode. In practice the inductors and capacitors have additional resistive components (are not perfect reactive parts) and would thus result in a large but finite voltage gain. 2 C junction = 50e − 12 = 0.00456 d.) Plugging Va=-9 V into the equation in part a, Cdiode=31.2pF and Rdiode still is infinity. Notice that this would change the resonance frequency of the circuit. Using this approach, one could select a given frequency to amplify will not amplifying all other frequencies. Thus, a radio, cell phone or similar receiver circuit might employ such a diode variable tuning element. e.) 1 w2 = L1C Diode 2πf = 1 L1C Diode 1 2π 1 = 1 MHz for part b 1 1 5e − 4(50e − 12) f= = 2π L1C Diode 1 1 = 1.27 MHz for part d 2π 5e − 4(31.2e − 12) Thus a substantial amount of tuning can be achieved by changing the diode bias voltage f.) At 1 MHz, neglecting the effect of Cdiode, the voltage divider becomes, Vout = V 1 RDiode thus , RDiode + jϖL1 RDiode RDiode RDiode = 0.001 = RDiode + j 3141 + j 2π (1e6)(5e − 4) RDiode = 3.14159 Ω but RDiode is the small signal resis tan ce of the diode, RDiode = rD = VT V ≈ T in forward bias (I D >> I S ) ID + IS ID Thus , I D = 0.0259 3.14159 = 8.2 mA This would be the current bias needed to attenuate the signal by the requested amount. Thus, the same circuit that gave a large voltage gain in reverse bias could be used to “blank” or “zero” the output voltage when the diode is now placed into forward bias. 6.) Jaeger 3.42 7.) Jaeger 3.46 ...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 02/17/2010 for the course ECE 3040 taught by Professor Hamblen during the Spring '07 term at Georgia Institute of Technology.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online